Ultraviolet Dosage and Decontamination Efficacy was Widely Variable Across 14 UV Devices after Testing a Dried Enveloped Ribonucleic Acid Virus Surrogate for SARS-CoV-2
T. L. Buhr, E. Borgers-Klonkowski, B. W. Gutting, E. E. Hammer, S. M. Hamilton, B. M. Huhman, S. L. Jackson, N. L. Kennihan, S. D. Lilly, J. D. Little, B. B. Luck, E. A. Matuczinski, C. T. Miller, R. E. Sides, V. L. Yates, A. A. Young
Abstract
AbstractO_ST_ABSAimsC_ST_ABSThe dosages and efficacy of 14 ultraviolet (UV) decontamination technologies were measured against a SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus that was dried on to different materials for lab and field testing. Methods and ResultsA live enveloped, ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus surrogate for SARS- CoV-2 was dried on stainless steel 304 (SS304), Navy Top Coat-painted SS304 (NTC), cardboard, polyurethane, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) at > 8.0 log10 plaque-forming units (PFU) per test coupon. The coupons were then exposed to UV radiation during both lab and field testing. Commercial and prototype UV- emitting devices were measured for efficacy: 4 handheld devices, 3 room/surface-disinfecting machines, 5 air-disinfection devices, and 2 larger custom-made machines. UV device dosages ranged from 0.01-729 mJ cm-2. Anti-viral efficacy among the different UV devices ranged from no decontamination up to nearly achieving sterilization. Importantly, cardboard required far more dosage than SS304. ConclusionsEnormous variability in dosage and efficacy was measured among the different UV devices. Porous materials limit the utility of UV decontamination. Significance and Impact of the StudyUV devices have wide variability in dosages, efficacy, hazards, and UV output over time indicating that each UV device needs independent technical measurement and assessment for product development, prior to, and during use.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rapid and Efficient Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 from Surfaces using UVC Light Emitting Diode Device
V. Dwivedi, J.-G. Park, … V. Kulkarni·bioRxiv·Apr 20, 2021
- Rapid, dose-dependent and efficient inactivation of surface dried SARS-CoV-2 by 254 nm UV-C irradiation
N. Ruetalo, R. Businger, M. Schindler·bioRxiv·Sep 22, 2020
- Pulsed broad-spectrum UV light effectively inactivates SARS-CoV-2 on multiple surfaces
A. S. Jureka, C. G. Williams, C. F. Basler·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2021
- Real-time inactivation of airborne SARS-CoV-2 using ultraviolet-C
C. Koutras, R. L. Wade·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2022
- Disinfection of SARS-CoV-2 contaminated surfaces of personal items with UVC-LED disinfection boxes
M. Bormann, M. Alt, … A. Krawczyk·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2021
- Genomic modeling as an approach to identify surrogates for use in experimental validation of SARS-CoV-2 and HuNoVs inactivation by UV-C treatment
B. Pendyala, A. Patras, D. DSouza·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2020