Sign in
NeuroscienceBrain stimulation
Peer-reviewed journal article

The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: monophasic vs biphasic TMS

Karen WendtiD, Majid Memarian SorkhabiiD, Charlotte Jane StaggiD, Melanie K. FlemingiD, Timothy DenisoniD, Jacinta O’SheaiD

Abstract

BackgroundIntermittent theta-burst stimulation (i)(TBS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plasticity protocol. Conventionally, TBS is applied using biphasic pulses due to hardware limitations. However, monophasic pulses are hypothesised to recruit cortical neurons more selectively than biphasic pulses, thus yielding stronger plasticity effects. Monophasic and biphasic TBS can be generated using a custom-made pulse-width modulation-based TMS device (pTMS). ObjectiveUsing pTMS, we tested the hypothesis that monophasic iTBS would induce greater plasticity effects than biphasic, measured as induced changes in motor corticospinal excitability. MethodsIn a repeated-measures design, thirty healthy volunteers participated in three separate sessions, where monophasic and biphasic iTBS was applied to the primary motor cortex (M1 condition) or the vertex (control condition). Plasticity was quantified as changes in motor corticospinal excitability after versus before iTBS, by comparing peak-to-peak amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEP) measured at baseline and over 60 minutes after iTBS. ResultsBoth monophasic and biphasic M1 iTBS led to significant increases in MEP amplitude. As predicted, monophasic iTBS induced a significantly larger effect than biphasic iTBS (linear mixed effect model analysis: ({chi}2(1) = 7.48, p = 0.006), which persisted even after subtracting each individuals control (vertex) condition data from the M1 conditions ({chi}2(1) = 5.48, p = 0.019). ConclusionsIn this study, monophasic iTBS induced a stronger motor corticospinal excitability increase than biphasic within participants. This greater physiological effect suggests that monophasic iTBS may also have potential for greater functional impact, of interest for future fundamental and clinical applications of TBS.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
26
FWCI
2.67
Field percentile
top 9%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISProulx '26Galanis '26Tse '18Carney '26Herrero '21Rodionov '23
85% semantic matchNeuroscience