The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: monophasic vs biphasic TMS
Karen WendtiD, Majid Memarian SorkhabiiD, Charlotte Jane StaggiD, Melanie K. FlemingiD, Timothy DenisoniD, Jacinta O’SheaiD
Abstract
BackgroundIntermittent theta-burst stimulation (i)(TBS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) plasticity protocol. Conventionally, TBS is applied using biphasic pulses due to hardware limitations. However, monophasic pulses are hypothesised to recruit cortical neurons more selectively than biphasic pulses, thus yielding stronger plasticity effects. Monophasic and biphasic TBS can be generated using a custom-made pulse-width modulation-based TMS device (pTMS). ObjectiveUsing pTMS, we tested the hypothesis that monophasic iTBS would induce greater plasticity effects than biphasic, measured as induced changes in motor corticospinal excitability. MethodsIn a repeated-measures design, thirty healthy volunteers participated in three separate sessions, where monophasic and biphasic iTBS was applied to the primary motor cortex (M1 condition) or the vertex (control condition). Plasticity was quantified as changes in motor corticospinal excitability after versus before iTBS, by comparing peak-to-peak amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEP) measured at baseline and over 60 minutes after iTBS. ResultsBoth monophasic and biphasic M1 iTBS led to significant increases in MEP amplitude. As predicted, monophasic iTBS induced a significantly larger effect than biphasic iTBS (linear mixed effect model analysis: ({chi}2(1) = 7.48, p = 0.006), which persisted even after subtracting each individuals control (vertex) condition data from the M1 conditions ({chi}2(1) = 5.48, p = 0.019). ConclusionsIn this study, monophasic iTBS induced a stronger motor corticospinal excitability increase than biphasic within participants. This greater physiological effect suggests that monophasic iTBS may also have potential for greater functional impact, of interest for future fundamental and clinical applications of TBS.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 26
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Field percentile
- top 9%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimizing Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation: The Effects of Pulse Parameters on Corticospinal Excitability
Beatrice Proulx, Seyede Anis Hasani, … Jean‐François Lepage·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2026
- Human cortical slices reveal pulse-number-dependent synaptic plasticity during theta-burst magnetic stimulation
Christos Galanis, Jakob Straehle, … Andreas Vlachos·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2026
- The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation
Nga Yan Tse, Mitchell R. Goldsworthy, … Nigel C. Rogasch·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2018
- High-density theta burst stimulation (hdTBS) at 100 Hz triples the aftereffects of the conventional intermittent TBS
Aidan Carney, Taylor Scott, … Hanbing Lu·Transcranial magnetic stimulation .Peer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2026
- Enhancing neuronal plasticity through intracranial theta burst stimulation in the human sensorimotor cortex.
Jose L. Herrero, Alexander Smith, … Stephan Bickel·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2021
- Reliability of resting-state EEG modulation by continuous and intermittent theta burst stimulation of the primary motor cortex: A sham-controlled study
Andrei Rodionov, Recep A. Ozdemir, … Mouhsin M. Shafi·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2023