Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation
Nga Yan TseiD, Mitchell R. GoldsworthyiD, Michael C. RiddingiD, James P. CoxoniD, Paul Bernard FitzgeraldiD, Alex FornitoiD, Nigel C. RogaschiD
Abstract
IntroductionTheta burst stimulation (TBS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation paradigm capable of influencing cortical circuits in humans by inducing neural plasticity. Applying spaced blocks of TBS can affect both the direction and magnitude of plasticity, but the impact of interval duration on these interactions following intermittent TBS (iTBS) is unclear.\n\nObjectivesTo assess the effect of interval duration on plasticity magnitude/direction following spaced iTBS.\n\nMethods15 healthy participants received three different iTBS conditions on separate days: single iTBS; spaced iTBS with a 5 minute interval (iTBS-5); and spaced iTBS with a 15 minute interval (iTBS-15). Changes in cortical excitability and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) resulting from iTBS were assessed via motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) measured from the first dorsal interosseus muscle before and up to 60 mins following stimulation.\n\nResultsiTBS-15 increased MEP amplitude up to 60 mins post stimulation, whereas iTBS-5 decreased MEP amplitude. In contrast, MEP amplitude was not altered by single iTBS. Despite the significant effect of iTBS-15 on MEP amplitude at the group level, there was still considerable inter-individual variability, with only 53% of individuals meeting response criteria. Modulation of SICI did not differ between conditions.\n\nConclusionsThe interval duration between spaced iTBS plays an important role in determining the direction of plasticity on excitatory, but not inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex. While iTBS-15 can increase the magnitude of facilitation in some individuals compared to single iTBS, this approach still suffers from high inter-individual variability.
- Citations
- 115
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Enhancing neuronal plasticity through intracranial theta burst stimulation in the human sensorimotor cortex.
Jose L. Herrero, Alexander Smith, … Stephan Bickel·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2021
- Human cortical slices reveal pulse-number-dependent synaptic plasticity during theta-burst magnetic stimulation
Christos Galanis, Jakob Straehle, … Andreas Vlachos·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2026
- Impact of different intensities of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the cortical properties during TMS-EEG and working memory performance
Sung Wook Chung, Nigel C. Rogasch, … Paul Bernard Fitzgerald·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2017
- Optimizing Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation: The Effects of Pulse Parameters on Corticospinal Excitability
Beatrice Proulx, Seyede Anis Hasani, … Jean‐François Lepage·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2026
- The effect of pulse shape in theta-burst stimulation: monophasic vs biphasic TMS
Karen Wendt, Majid Memarian Sorkhabi, … Jacinta O’Shea·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2023
- Extended-Interval Theta Burst Stimulation Enhances Glutamatergic Plasticity and Antidepressant Effects via Reduced GABAergic Recruitment
Morteza Salimi, Milad Nazari, … Dhakshin Ramanathan·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2024