henhaobio
Sign in

Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation

Nga Yan TseiD, Mitchell R. GoldsworthyiD, Michael C. RiddingiD, James P. CoxoniD, Paul Bernard FitzgeraldiD, Alex FornitoiD, Nigel C. RogaschiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

IntroductionTheta burst stimulation (TBS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation paradigm capable of influencing cortical circuits in humans by inducing neural plasticity. Applying spaced blocks of TBS can affect both the direction and magnitude of plasticity, but the impact of interval duration on these interactions following intermittent TBS (iTBS) is unclear.\n\nObjectivesTo assess the effect of interval duration on plasticity magnitude/direction following spaced iTBS.\n\nMethods15 healthy participants received three different iTBS conditions on separate days: single iTBS; spaced iTBS with a 5 minute interval (iTBS-5); and spaced iTBS with a 15 minute interval (iTBS-15). Changes in cortical excitability and short-interval cortical inhibition (SICI) resulting from iTBS were assessed via motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) measured from the first dorsal interosseus muscle before and up to 60 mins following stimulation.\n\nResultsiTBS-15 increased MEP amplitude up to 60 mins post stimulation, whereas iTBS-5 decreased MEP amplitude. In contrast, MEP amplitude was not altered by single iTBS. Despite the significant effect of iTBS-15 on MEP amplitude at the group level, there was still considerable inter-individual variability, with only 53% of individuals meeting response criteria. Modulation of SICI did not differ between conditions.\n\nConclusionsThe interval duration between spaced iTBS plays an important role in determining the direction of plasticity on excitatory, but not inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex. While iTBS-15 can increase the magnitude of facilitation in some individuals compared to single iTBS, this approach still suffers from high inter-individual variability.

Citations
115
FWCI
4.49
Field percentile
top 4%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHerrero '21Galanis '26Chung '17Proulx '26Wendt '23Salimi '24
86% semantic matchNeuroscience
Jose L. Herrero, Alexander Smith, Akash Mishra+3 more·bioRxiv·Mar 29, 2021