Sign in
GenomicsGigaScience
Peer-reviewed journal article

The draft nuclear genome assembly of Eucalyptus pauciflora: new approaches to comparing de novo assemblies

Weiwen WangiD, Ashutosh DasiD, David KaineriD, Miriam SchalamuniD, Alejandro Morales-SuareziD, Benjamin SchwessingeriD, Robert LanfeariD

Abstract

BackgroundSelecting the best genome assembly from a collection of draft assemblies for the same species remains a difficult task. Here, we combine new and existing approaches to help to address this, using the non-model plant Eucalyptus pauciflora (snow gum) as a test case. Eucalyptus pauciflora is a long-lived tree with high economic and ecological importance. Currently, little genomic information for Eucalyptus pauciflora is available.\n\nFindingsWe generated high coverage of long-(Nanopore, 174x) and short-(Illumina, 228x) read data from a single Eucalyptus pauciflora individual and compared assemblies from four assemblers with a variety of settings: Canu, Flye, Marvel, and MaSuRCA. A key component of our approach is to keep a randomly selected collection of ~10% of both long- and short-reads separate from the assemblies to use as a validation set with which to assess the assemblies. Using this validation set along with a range of existing tools, we compared the assemblies in eight ways: contig N50, BUSCO scores, LAI scores, assembly ploidy, base-level error rate, computing genome assembly likelihoods, structural variation and genome sequence similarity. Our result showed that MaSuRCA generated the best assembly, which is 594.87 Mb in size, with a contig N50 of 3.23 Mb, and an estimated error rate of ~0.006 errors per base.\n\nConclusionsWe report a draft genome of Eucalyptus pauciflora, which will be a valuable resource for further genomic studies of eucalypts. These approaches for assessing and comparing genomes should help in assessing and choosing among many potential genome assemblies for a single species.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.