PLoS Computational BiologyGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
SVCurator: A Crowdsourcing app to visualize evidence of structural variants for the human genome
Lesley M. ChapmaniD, Noah SpiesiD, Patrick PaiiD, Chun Shen LimiD, Andrew W. CarrolliD, Giuseppe NarzisiiD, Christopher Mark WatsoniD, Christos ProukakisiD, Wayne E. ClarkeiD, Naoki Nariai, Eric T. DawsoniD, Garan JonesiD, Daniel J BlankenbergiD, Christian BruefferiD, Chunlin XiaoiD, Sree Rohit Raj KoloraiD, Noah AlexanderiD, Paul WolujewicziD, Azza E. AhmediD, Graeme Smith, Saadlee ShehreeniD, Aaron M. WengeriD, Marc SalitiD, Justin M. ZookiD
Abstract
A high quality benchmark for small variants encompassing 88 to 90% of the reference genome has been developed for seven Genome in a Bottle (GIAB) reference samples. However a reliable benchmark for large indels and structural variants (SVs) is yet to be defined. In this study, we manually curated 1235 SVs which can ultimately be used to evaluate SV callers or train machine learning models. We developed a crowdsourcing app - SVCurator - to help curators manually review large indels and SVs within the human genome, and report their genotype and size accuracy.\n\nSVCurator is a Python Flask-based web platform that displays images from short, long, and linked read sequencing data from the GIAB Ashkenazi Jewish Trio son [NIST RM 8391/HG002], We asked curators to assign labels describing SV type (deletion or insertion), size accuracy, and genotype for 1235 putative insertions and deletions sampled from different size bins between 20 and 892,149 bp. The crowdsourced results were highly concordant with 37 out of the 61 curators having at least 78% concordance with a set of expert curators, where there was 93% concordance amongst expert curators. This produced high confidence labels for 935 events. When compared to the heuristic-based draft benchmark SV callset from GIAB, the SVCurator crowdsourced labels were 94.5% concordant with the benchmark set. We found that curators can successfully evaluate putative SVs when given evidence from multiple sequencing technologies.
- organism: human
- assay: long-read sequencing
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 19
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Field percentile
- top 16%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- SV-plaudit: A cloud-based framework for manually curating thousands of structural variants
Jonathan R. Belyeu, Thomas J Nicholas, … Ryan M. Layer·GigaSciencePeer-reviewed·May 31, 2018
- svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls
Hemang Parikh, Marghoob Mohiyuddin, … Marc L. Salit·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 16, 2016
- A robust benchmark for germline structural variant detection
Justin M. Zook, Nancy Fisher Hansen, … Marc Salit·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2019
- Anyone can be the best: Impact of diverse methodologies on the evaluation of structural variant callers
Luca Denti, Thomas Krannich, … Fereydoun Hormozdiari·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2025
- SVCollector: Optimized sample selection for validating and long-read resequencing of structural variants
Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck, Zachary H. Lemmon, … Michael C. Schatz·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2018
- svtools: population-scale analysis of structural variation
David E. Larson, Haley Abel, … Ira M. Hall·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2019