The changing status of imperiled species in British Columbia over the last 15 years in the absence of a dedicated species at risk law
Peter R. ThompsoniD, Meg Bjordal, Morgan L. PiczakiD, Sarah Perin OttoiD
Abstract
Gaps in biodiversity protection occur in Canada due to limited jurisdiction of federal species-at-risk laws and the absence of dedicated legislation in many provinces, including British Columbia (B.C.). While lacking legal protection, B.C. maintains Red, Blue, and Yellow Lists of threatened, special-concern, and secure species, respectively, using a NatureServe ranking system. We compiled historical data on species status in B.C. between 2008 and 2024 from the B.C. Conservation Data Centre. B.C. is home to 5,485 Yellow, 1,116 Blue, 491 Red-listed species. Changes in status over this time period were reported for 967 animal species, with an even split in uplistings (more imperiled) and downlistings (less imperiled). More status changes were reported for plants (2,902), mainly due to updated methodology leading to a lower risk status. Analysing the accompanying explanation for each status change revealed that most changes were non-genuine (e.g., new information, taxonomy, or methodology) rather than genuine (e.g., true changes in population size, range, or threats). Genuine improvements in the status of species in B.C. have been exceedingly rare. This analysis indicates that current laws and regulations have been insufficient to recover species at risk within B.C. Plain-language summaryBritish Columbia is the most biodiverse province in Canada, yet 1,607 species are imperiled in the province. We analysed trends, finding a 16% rise in the number of species at risk since 2008. By analysing the provided explanations, we found that status improvements were mostly "non-genuine", caused by changing methodology and/or new data. Strengthening legal protections is essential to prevent biodiversity loss in the province.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List
S. M. E. Marsh, M. Hoffmann, … M. Bohm·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2020
- What works to improve species conservation state? An analysis of species whose state has improved and the actions responsible
Ashley T. Simkins, William J. Sutherland, … Silviu O. Petrovan·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2025
- High conservation priority of range-edge plant populations not matched by habitat protection or research effort
P. Caissy, S. Klemet-N'Guessan, … A. Hargreaves·bioRxiv·May 12, 2020
- Mapping nationally and globally at-risk species to identify hotspots for (and gaps in) conservation
M. E. Hardouin, A. L. Hargreaves·bioRxiv·Nov 29, 2021
- Biodiversity on Indigenous lands equals that in protected areas
Richard Schuster, Ryan R. Germain, … Peter Arcese·bioRxiv·May 15, 2018
- Assessing risk for butterflies in the context of climate change, demographic uncertainty, and heterogenous data sources
M. L. Forister, E. M. Grames, … T. V. Riecke·bioRxiv·May 22, 2022