bioRxivEvolutionary Biology
Drift and directional selection are the evolutionary forces driving gene expression divergence in eye and brain tissue of Heliconius butterflies
Abstract
Investigating gene expression evolution over micro- and macroevolutionary timescales will expand our understanding of the role of gene expression in adaptation and speciation. In this study, we characterized which evolutionary forces are acting on gene expression levels in eye and brain tissue of five Heliconius butterflies with divergence times of ~5-12 MYA. We developed and applied Brownian motion and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models to identify genes whose expression levels are evolving through drift, stabilizing selection, or a lineage-specific shift. We find that 81% of the genes evolve under genetic drift. When testing for branch-specific shifts in gene expression, we detected 368 (16%) shift events. Genes showing a shift towards up-regulation have significantly lower gene expression variance than those genes showing a shift leading towards down-regulation. We hypothesize that directional selection is acting in shifts causing up-regulation, since transcription is costly. We further uncover through simulations that parameter estimation of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models is biased when using small phylogenies and only becomes reliable with phylogenies having at least 50 taxa. Therefore, we developed a new statistical test based on Brownian motion to identify highly conserved genes (i.e., evolving under strong stabilizing selection), which comprised 3% of the orthoclusters. In conclusion, we found that drift is the dominant evolutionary force driving gene expression evolution in eye and brain tissue in Heliconius. Nevertheless, the higher proportion of genes evolving under directional than under stabilizing selection might reflect species-specific selective pressures on vision and brain necessary to fulfill species-specific requirements.
- organism: multiple species
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Interspecific divergence of gene expression biophysics driven by both evolutionary systems drift and strong selective constraints on bursting rate
Catherine Felce, Joshua G. Schraiber, … Matthew W. Pennell·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2025
- The evolution of sex-biased gene expression in the Drosophila brain
S. Khodursky, N. Svetec, … L. Zhao·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2020
- The evolution of ovary-biased gene expression in Hawaiian Drosophila
S. H. Church, C. Munro, … C. G. Extavour·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2021
- Visual mate preference evolution during butterfly speciation is linked to neural processing genes
M. Rossi, A. E. Hausmann, … R. M. Merrill·bioRxiv·Mar 22, 2020
- Conservation and flexibility in the gene regulatory landscape of Heliconiine butterfly wings
J. J. Hanly, R. W. Wallbank, … C. D. Jiggins·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2019
- Gene expression evolution is predicted by stronger indirect selection at more pleiotropic genes.
Eva L. Koch, Charles Rocabert, … Frédéric Guillaume·Evolution LettersPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2025