henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of AnatomyEvolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

VARIATION IN HEAD AND PINNA MORPHOLOGY OF PRESERVED PEROMYSCUS SPP. SPECIMENS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AUDITORY FUNCTION

Casey E. SergottiD, Katelynn Rodman, Nathaniel T. GreeneiD, Ben‐Zheng LiiD, Luberson JosephiD, Fabio Andrade MachadoiD, Genesis A. AlarconiD, Elizabeth A. McCullaghiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The characteristics of an animals head and pinna mark the beginning of auditory communication. Auditory communication is broadly achieved by receiving sounds from the environment and plays a vital role in an animals ability to perceive and localize sounds. Natural history museums and collections along with their vast repositories of specimens provide a unique resource for examining how the variability in both the size and shape of the head and pinna cause variability in the detection of acoustic signals across species. Using this approach, we measured the dimensions of the head and pinna of over 1,200 preserved specimens of Peromyscus boylii, P. californicus, P. gossypinus, P. leucopus, P. maniculatus, and P. truei, followed by a series of head-related transfer functions (HRTFs) on several individuals to study the relationship between morphology and available auditory information. Our morphological results show significant variation in pinna length and width, as well as in the distance between the two ears across the six species. ITDs and ILDs were calculated and demonstrated consistent results across species, suggesting the differences in head and pinna size do not significantly modify these cues. Not only does this study contribute to existing research on external morphology and auditory function, but it also provides valuable insight into the use of preserved specimens in auditory research, an area that is currently understudied. Summary statementThis work aims to provide insight into using natural history museum specimens for morphological research pertaining to the auditory system in small mammals.

Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
16th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISJoseph '25Islam '26Chen '22New '24Dunn '25Loconsole '23
69% semantic matchNeuroscience
Luberson Joseph, Emily M. New, Desi Marie Joseph+5 more·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·Jun 1, 2025· 6 citations