Auditory Brainstem Responses in Two Closely Related Peromyscus Species (Peromyscus leucopus and Peromyscus maniculatus)
Luberson JosephiD, Emily M. New, Desi Marie JosephiD, Tamara Chenell Woodley, Vanessa Yamileth Franco, Ben‐Zheng LiiD, Guinevere O. U. WoganiD, Elizabeth A. McCullaghiD
Abstract
The genus Peromyscus has been extensively used as a model for ecological, behavioral, and evolutionary studies. We used auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), craniofacial morphology, and pinna measurements to compare characteristics that could impact the threshold, amplitude, and latency of ABRs in two wild-caught species, P. leucopus and P. maniculatus. We observed significant differences in craniofacial and pinna attributes between species, with P. leucopus exhibiting larger features and bigger overall size compared to P. maniculatus. ABR recordings showed similar hearing thresholds with peak sensitivity between 8 to 46 kHz for both species. We found that amplitude of ABR wave I and IV increased significantly with increasing intensity, while no main effect of species was detected. Latency of wave I and IV significantly decreased with increasing intensity in both species. Finally, we observed longer latencies of the binaural interaction component (BIC) at longer interaural time differences (ITDs) in P. leucopus, while no differences were observed across relative BIC amplitude between species. These results provide additional ABR related data that expands the use of both Peromyscus species as future models for auditory research.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Differences in Auditory Brainstem Responses between Laboratory-reared and Wild-caught Prairie Voles (Microtus ochrogaster)
Luberson Joseph, Naleyshka Colon-Rivera, … Elizabeth A. McCullagh·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2026
- VARIATION IN HEAD AND PINNA MORPHOLOGY OF PRESERVED PEROMYSCUS SPP. SPECIMENS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AUDITORY FUNCTION
Casey E. Sergott, Katelynn Rodman, … Elizabeth A. McCullagh·Journal of AnatomyPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2025
- Comparative analysis of primary auditory cortical responses in bats and mice to repetitive stimuli trains
Katrina E. Deane, Francisco García‐Rosales, … Max F. K. Happel·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2022
- Characterizing Simultaneously Recorded Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Responses Using the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response Paradigm
Isabel Nola Herb, Melissa Jane Polonenko·Ear and HearingPeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2026
- Enhanced Place Specificity of the Parallel Auditory Brainstem Response: An Electrophysiological Study
Thomas J. Stoll, Ross K. Maddox·Journal of the Association for Research in OtolaryngologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2024
- Optimizing parameters for using the parallel auditory brainstem response (pABR) to quickly estimate hearing thresholds
Melissa Jane Polonenko, Ross K. Maddox·Ear and HearingPeer-reviewed·Sep 28, 2021