Comparing approaches to quantify urbanization on a multicontinental scale
David Murray‐StokeriD, James S. SantangeloiD, Marta SzulkiniD, Marc T. J. JohnsoniD
Abstract
Urbanization is an increasingly prevalent driver of environmental, ecological, and evolutionary change in both terrestrial and aquatic systems, and it is important that our sampling designs accurately capture this urban environmental change. Common approaches to sampling urban environments include: urban-nonurban transects, which sample along urbanization gradients; random points, which sample locations at random within an area of interest; and systematic points, which sample locations based on a regularly-spaced grid from a predetermined starting point within the area of interest. Presently, we lack a comparative analysis of the efficacy of these different sampling designs in capturing variation in urban environments. Here, we compare the environmental variation captured by transect- and point-based sampling designs in 136 cities across six continents. We quantified and compared a common set of environmental variables for each sampling design, with variables capturing landcover, climate, and socioeconomic facets of urban environments. Mean landcover and socioeconomic metrics consistently differed among sampling designs, in contrast to climate variables that primarily varied among cities. Additionally, changes in environmental variables with distance from the city centre depended on the sampling design, with this distance-by-sampling design interaction present in 27%-51% of cities, depending on the environmental variable. This implies that the rate of environmental change along urban-nonurban gradients frequently depends on the sampling design used. We also examined potential causes of deviations between transect- and point-based sampling designs and identified human population density and city area as common predictors of deviations between transect- and point-sampling designs. Our results show that sampling design can dictate how the urban environment is characterized, with sampling design as important - or more important - as the selected environmental variable. We further developed R code so researchers can implement these methods as they develop and validate sampling designs in novel or unstudied urban environments.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Field percentile
- top 28%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Applying a classification approach to categorizing urbanized landscapes in California and their invasion by the Maltese starthistle Centaurea melitensis
Anthony J. Dant, Lily Bishop, Katrina M. Dlugosch·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2025
- Elongated sample plot shapes produce higher measurement precision in clustering populations
R. McGarvey, P. Burch, J. M. Matthews·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2021
- Global urban forest cover and nature access is insufficient for human wellbeing and worsening
Robert Ian McDonald, Mariami Marsagishvili, … Peter Olsson·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2026
- Spatiotemporal patterns of urbanization in three Swiss urban agglomerations: insights from landscape metrics, growth modes and fractal analysis
- Stocktaking the environmental coverage of a continental ecosystem observation network
G. R. Guerin, K. J. Williams, … A. J. Lowe·EcospherePeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2020
- Urbanization effects are trait-specific and city-dependent across a widespread spider's global range
Bram Vanthournout, Maxime Dahirel, … Dries Bonte·bioRxiv·Jun 22, 2026