Performance of a Protein Language Model for Variant Annotation in Cardiac Disease
Aviram HochstadtiD, Chirag R. BarbhaiyaiD, Anthony AizeriD, Scott Bernstein, Marina CerroneiD, Leonid GarberiD, Douglas HolmesiD, Robert J. KnottsiD, Alexander KushniriD, Jacob Andrew MartiniD, David S. ParkiD, Michael A. Spinelli, Felix YangiD, Larry A. ChinitziD, Lior JankelsoniD
Abstract
IntroductionGenetic testing is a cornerstone in the assessment of many cardiac diseases. However, variants are frequently classified as Variants of Unknown Significance (VUS), limiting the utility of testing. Recently, the DeepMind group (Google, USA) developed AlphaMissense, a unique Artificial Intelligence (AI) based model, based on language model principles for the prediction of missense variant pathogenicity. ObjectiveTo report on the performance of AlphaMissense, accessed by VarCardio, an open web-based variant annotation engine, in a real-world cardiovascular genetics center. MethodsAll genetic variants from an inherited arrhythmia program were examined using AlphaMissense via VarCard.io and compared to the ClinVar variant classification system, as well as another variant classification platform (Franklin by Genoox). The mutation reclassification rate and genotype phenotype concordance were examined for all variants in the study. ResultsWe included 266 patients with heritable cardiac diseases, harboring 339 missense variants. Of those, 230 (67.8%) were classified by ClinVar as either VUS or non-classified. Using VarCard.io, 198 VUSs (86.1%, CI 80.9-90.3%) were reclassified to either Likely Pathgenic (LP) or Likely benign (LB). The reclassification rate was significantly higher for VarCard.io than for Franklin (86.1% vs 34.8%, p<0.001). Genotype-Phenotype concordance was highly aligned using VarCard.io predictions, at 95.9% (CI 92.8-97.9%) concordance rate. For 109 variants classified as Pathogenic, LP, Benign or LB by ClinVar, concordance with VarCard.io was high (90.5%). ConclusionAlphaMissense, accessed via VarCard.io, may be a highly efficient tool for cardiac genetic variant interpretation. The engines notable performance in assessing variants that are classified as VUS in ClinVar, demonstrates its potential to enhance cardiac genetic testing.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Field percentile
- top 24%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Disease-specific variant pathogenicity prediction significantly improves variant interpretation in inherited cardiac conditions
Xiaolei Zhang, Roddy Walsh, … James S. Ware·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 12, 2020
- CardioClassifier: demonstrating the power of disease- and gene-specific computational decision support for clinical genome interpretation
Nicola Whiffin, Roddy Walsh, … Stuart A. Cook·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2018
- HeartVar: An LLM-Assisted Tool for Clinical Classification of Variants in Cardiovascular Disease Cohorts
Jamie‐Lee M. Thompson, Debjani Das, … Eleni Giannoulatou·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2026
- Discordance between a deep learning model and clinical-grade variant pathogenicity classification in a rare disease cohort
Sek Won Kong, In‐Hee Lee, … Kenneth D. Mandl·npj Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 28, 2025
- Reassessment of Mendelian gene pathogenicity using 7,855 cardiomyopathy cases and 60,706 reference samples
Roddy Walsh, Kate Thomson, … Hugh C Watkins·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2017
- Beyond gene-disease validity: capturing structured data on inheritance, allelic-requirement, disease-relevant variant classes, and disease mechanism for inherited cardiac conditions
Katherine S. Josephs, Angharad M. Roberts, … James S. Ware·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2023