CardioClassifier: demonstrating the power of disease- and gene-specific computational decision support for clinical genome interpretation
Nicola WhiffiniD, Roddy WalshiD, Risha GovindiD, Matthew Edwards, Mian Ahmad, Xiaolei ZhangiD, Upasana TayaliD, Rachel J. BuchaniD, William Midwinter, Alicja Wilk, Hanna NajgebaueriD, Catherine FrancisiD, Sam Wilkinson, Thomas Monk, Laura Brett, Declan P. O’ReganiD, Sanjay PrasadiD, Deborah J. Morris-RosendahliD, Paul J.R. BartoniD, Elizabeth Edwards, James S. WareiD, Stuart A. CookiD
Abstract
PurposeInternationally-adopted variant interpretation guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) are generic and require disease-specific refinement. Here we developed CardioClassifier (www.cardioclassifier.org), a semi-automated decision-support tool for inherited cardiac conditions (ICCs).\n\nMethodsCardioClassifier integrates data retrieved from multiple sources with user-input case-specific information, through an interactive interface, to support variant interpretation. Combining disease- and gene-specific knowledge with variant observations in large cohorts of cases and controls, we refined 14 computational ACMG criteria and created three ICC-specific rules.\n\nResultsWe benchmarked CardioClassifier on 57 expertly-curated variants and show full retrieval of all computational data, concordantly activating 87.3% of rules. A generic annotation tool identified fewer than half as many clinically-actionable variants (64/219 vs 156/219, Fishers P=1.1x10-18), with important false positives; illustrating the critical importance of disease and gene-specific annotations.\n\nCardioClassifier identified putatively disease-causing variants in 33.7% of 327 cardiomyopathy cases, comparable with leading ICC laboratories. Through addition of manually-curated data, variants found in over 40% of cardiomyopathy cases are fully annotated, without requiring additional user-input data.\n\nConclusionCardioClassifier is an ICC-specific decision-support tool that integrates expertly curated computational annotations with case-specific data to generate fast, reproducible and interactive variant pathogenicity reports, according to best practice guidelines.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 104
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Disease-specific variant pathogenicity prediction significantly improves variant interpretation in inherited cardiac conditions
Xiaolei Zhang, Roddy Walsh, … James S. Ware·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 12, 2020
- HeartVar: An LLM-Assisted Tool for Clinical Classification of Variants in Cardiovascular Disease Cohorts
Jamie‐Lee M. Thompson, Debjani Das, … Eleni Giannoulatou·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2026
- Performance of a Protein Language Model for Variant Annotation in Cardiac Disease
Aviram Hochstadt, Chirag R. Barbhaiya, … Lior Jankelson·Journal of the American Heart AssociationPeer-reviewed·Oct 11, 2024
- Quantitative approaches to variant classification increase the yield and precision of genetic testing in Mendelian diseases: The case of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Roddy Walsh, Francesco Mazzarotto, … James S. Ware·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2019
- Beyond gene-disease validity: capturing structured data on inheritance, allelic-requirement, disease-relevant variant classes, and disease mechanism for inherited cardiac conditions
Katherine S. Josephs, Angharad M. Roberts, … James S. Ware·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Oct 23, 2023
- Automating ACMG Variant Classifications With BIAS-2015 v2.0.0: Algorithm Analysis and Benchmark Against the FDA-Approved eRepo Dataset
Christopher Edward Eisenhart, Rachel Brickey, … Vafa Bayat·medRxiv·Feb 23, 2025