SpacerPlacer: Ancestral reconstruction of CRISPR arrays reveals the evolutionary dynamics of spacer deletions
Axel FehrenbachiD, Alexander MitrofanoviD, Omer S. AlkhnbashiiD, Rolf BackofeniD, Franz BaumdickeriD
Abstract
Bacteria employ CRISPR-Cas systems for defense by integrating invader-derived sequences, termed spacers, into the CRISPR array, which constitutes an immunity memory. While spacer deletions occur randomly across the array, newly acquired spacers are predominantly integrated at the leader end. Consequently, spacer arrays can be used to derive the chronology of spacer insertions. Reconstruction of ancestral spacer acquisitions and deletions could help unravel the coevolution of phages and bacteria, the evolutionary dynamics in microbiomes, or track pathogens. However, standard reconstruction methods produce misleading results by overlooking insertion order and joint deletions of spacers. Here, we present SpacerPlacer, a maximum likelihood-based ancestral reconstruction approach for CRISPR array evolution. We used SpacerPlacer to reconstruct and investigate ancestral deletion events of 4565 CRISPR arrays, revealing that spacer deletions occur 374 times more frequently than mutations and are regularly deleted jointly, with an average of 2.7 spacers. Surprisingly, we observed a decrease in the spacer deletion frequency towards both ends of the reconstructed arrays. While the resulting trailer-end conservation is commonly observed, a reduced deletion frequency is now also detectable towards the variable leader end. Finally, our results point to the hypothesis that frequent loss of recently acquired spacers may provide a selective advantage.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Field percentile
- top 20%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High Frequency of Dynamic Rearrangements in CRISPR Loci
Y. Ou, J. O. McInerney·bioRxiv·May 19, 2022
- Optimal Number Of Spacers In CRISPR Arrays
Alexander Martynov, Konstantin Severinov, Yaroslav Ispolatov·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 18, 2017
- The CRISPR Spacer Space Is Dominated By Sequences From The Species-Specific Mobilome
S. A. Shmakov, V. Sitnik, … E. Koonin·bioRxiv·May 12, 2017
- An evolutionary approach to predict the orientation of CRISPR arrays
Axel Fehrenbach, Alexander Mitrofanov, … Franz Baumdicker·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2025
- Dynamic Regulation of the Immune Repertoire of Bacteria
Zhibing Zhang, Sidhartha Goyal·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2025
- How important is CRISPR-Cas for protecting natural populations of bacteria against infections by mobile genetic elements??
E. Westra, B. R. Levin·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2020