Same Sentences, Different Grammars, Different Brain Responses: An MEG study on Case and Agreement Encoding in Hindi and Nepali Split-Ergative Structures

At first glance, the brains language network appears to be universal, but languages clearly differ. How does the brain adapt to the specific details of individual grammatical systems? Here, we present an MEG study on case and agreement in Hindi and Nepali. Both languages use split-ergative case systems. However, these systems interact with verb agreement differently - in Hindi, case features conspire to determine which noun phrase (NP) the verb agrees with (subject, object, or neither), but in Nepali the verb always agrees with the subject NP. We found that left inferior frontal and left anterior temporal regions are sensitive to case features in both languages. Across case configurations, these same brain areas in Hindi participants show different patterns of activity for sentences that require masculine vs. feminine marking on the verb, before the comprehenders encounter it. Additionally, the left temporoparietal junction in Hindi shows different activity for subject and object agreement configurations. Both findings are not observed in Nepali participants. We suggest that this brain response demonstrates a unique-to-Hindi selection of an agreement controller and pre-encoding of the verbs morphological features. This shows that brain activity reflects psycholinguistic processes that are intimately tied to grammatical features. HighlightsO_LIThe left inferior frontal lobe and the left anterior temporal lobe distinguish accusative objects versus bare object NPs in Hindi and Nepali, and pre-emptively encode gender agreement features in Hindi. C_LIO_LIThe left inferior parietal lobe shows a differential sensitivity to object-agreement and subject-agreement constructions in Hindi that is absent in Nepali C_LIO_LIMEG can reveal differences in neural activity that reflect specific requirements of different grammatical systems C_LI