Assessment of Contralateral Efferent Effects in Human Via ECochG
Eric VerschooteniD, Elizabeth A. StricklandiD, Nicolas VerhaertiD, Philip X. JorisiD
Abstract
Efferent projections from the brainstem to the inner ear are well-described anatomically and physiologically but their precise function remains debated. The medial olivocochlear (MOC) system and its reflex, the MOCR, have been particularly well studied. In animals, anatomical and physiological data are fine-grained and extensive and suggest an important role for the MOCR in anti-masking e.g. to improve the detection of tones in background noise. Extensive behavioral studies in human support this role, but direct linking of behavioral paradigms to the MOCR is challenging because of the difficulty in obtaining appropriate human neural measures. We developed a new approach in which mass potentials were recorded near the cochlea of normal hearing and awake human volunteers to increase the signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio, and examined whether broadband noise to the contralateral ear elicited MOCR anti-masking effects as reported in animals. Probing the mass potential to the onset of brief tones at 4 and 6 kHz, convincing anti-masking or suppressive effects consistent with the MOCR were not detected. We then changed the recording technique to examine the neural phase-locked contribution to the mass potential in response to long, low-frequency tones, and found that contralateral sound suppressed neural responses in a systematic and progressive manner. We followed up with psychophysical experiments in which we found that contralateral noise elevated detection threshold for tones up to 4 kHz. Our study provides a new way to study efferent effects in the human peripheral auditory system and shows that contralateral efferent effects are biased towards low frequencies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Auditory efferents facilitate intensity change detection in humans: evidence from concurrent ear, brain, and behavior measures
Yuan He, Miranda Adamczak, … Sriram Boothalingam·bioRxiv·Mar 6, 2025
- Auditory attention reduced ear-canal noise in humans, but not through medial olivocochlear efferent inhibition: Implications for measuring otoacoustic emissions during behavioral task performance
Nikolas A. Francis, Wei Zhao, John J. Guinan·Frontiers in Systems NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 13, 2018
- Auditory Brainstem Mechanisms Likely Compensate for Self-imposed Peripheral Inhibition
Abigayle Peterson, Vijayalakshmi Easwar, … Sriram Boothalingam·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2022
- A Subcortical Model for Auditory Forward Masking with Efferent Control of Cochlear Gain
Braden N. Maxwell, Afagh Farhadi, … Laurel H. Carney·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2024
- A computational model of the mammalian auditory periphery with a multichannel, energy-driven, medial olivocochlear reflex
Daniel R. Guest, Afagh Farhadi, Laurel H. Carney·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2025
- Motor-evoked neural responses in auditory cortex are associated with improved sensitivity to self-generated sounds
Daniel Reznik, Noa Hacohen, … Roy Mukamel·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2020