Sign in
Cancer BiologyPeerJ
Peer-reviewed journal article

Simpler predictive models provide higher accuracy for ovarian cancer detection

Derrick E. WoodiD, Joseph RoyiD, Bari J. BallewiD

Abstract

Ovarian cancer remains a danger to womens health, and accurate screening tests would likely increase survival. Two established protein biomarkers, CA125 and HE4, have been shown to work well in isolation, but achieve even higher accuracy when combined using logistic regression (LR). We show here that this LR-based combination of protein concentrations achieves high accuracy when distinguishing healthy samples from cancer samples (AUC = 0.99) and benign masses from cancer (AUC = 0.86). This approach exhibits superior performance on an external validation cohort compared to a more complex method, which was published with the dataset we use here and tested on the same data. While our method only uses proteins, the more complex method also uses features derived from cell-free DNA (cfDNA). We show that many of that methods cfDNA features are affected by confounding technical variation, which impacts the previously reported results. Our results are in line with the principle that simpler machine learning models will tend to exhibit better generalizability on new data.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
1
FWCI
0.75
Field percentile
top 23%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.