GeneticsEvolutionary BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Estimating effective population size from temporal allele frequency changes in experimental evolution
Agnes Jonas, Thomas Taus, Carolin Kosiol, Christian SchlöttereriD, Andreas Futschik
Abstract
The effective population size (Ne) is a major factor determining allele frequency changes in natural and experimental populations. Temporal methods provide a powerful and simple approach to estimate short-term Ne. They use allele frequency shifts between temporal samples to calculate the standardized variance, which is directly related to Ne. Here we focus on experimental evolution studies that often rely on repeated sequencing of samples in pools (Pool-Seq). Pool-Seq is cost-effective and outperforms individual-based sequencing in estimating allele frequencies, but it is associated with atypical sampling properties: additional to sampling individuals, sequencing DNA in pools leads to a second round of sampling increasing the estimated allele frequency variance. We propose a new estimator of Ne, which relies on allele frequency changes in temporal data and corrects for the variance in both sampling steps. In simulations, we obtain accurate Ne estimates, as long as the drift variance is not too small compared to the sampling and sequencing variance. In addition to genome-wide Ne estimates, we extend our method using a recursive partitioning approach to estimate Ne locally along the chromosome. Since type I error is accounted for, our method permits the identification of genomic regions that differ significantly in Ne. We present an application to Pool-Seq data from experimental evolution with Drosophila, and provide recommendations for whole-genome data. The estimator is computationally efficient and available as an R-package at https://github.com/ThomasTaus/Nest.
- organism: Drosophila
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Accurate allele frequencies from ultra-low coverage pool-seq samples in evolve-and-resequence experiments
S. Tilk, A. O. Bergland, … S. Greenblum·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2019
- Monitoring rapid evolution of plant populations at scale with Pool-Sequencing
L. Czech, Y. Peng, … M. Exposito-Alonso·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2022
- poolHelper: an R package to help in designing Pool-Seq studies
João Carvalho, Rui Faria, … Vítor C. Sousa·Methods in Ecology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2023
- Efficient inference of population size histories and locus-specific mutation rates from large-sample genomic variation data
Anand Bhaskar, Y.X. Rachel Wang, Yun S. Song·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2014
- ONeSAMP 3.0: Effective Population Size via SNP Data for One Population Sample
Aaron Hong, Rebecca G. Cheek, … Christina A. Boucher·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2023
- SelNeTime: a python package inferring effective population size and selection intensity from genomic time series data
Mathieu Uhl, Paul Bunel, … Bertrand Servin·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·May 21, 2026