Sign in
GeneticsJournal of Systematics and Evolution
Peer-reviewed journal article

The northern gene flow into southeastern East Asians inferred from genome-wide array genotyping

Guanglin HeiD, Ying‐Xiang Li, Xing ZouiD, Hui‐Yuan YehiD, Renkuan TangiD, Peixin WangiD, Jingya Bai, Xiaomin YangiD, Zheng WangiD, Jianxin GuoiD, Jinwen CheniD, Jing CheniD, Meiqing YangiD, Jing ZhaoiD, Jin SuniD, Kongyang ZhuiD, Hao MaiD, Rui WangiD, Wenjiao Yang, Rong HuiD, Lan‐Hai WeiiD, Yi‐Ping Hou, Mengge WangiD, Gang CheniD, Chuan‐Chao WangiD

Abstract

The population history of Southeast China remains poorly understood due to the sparse sampling of present-day populations and far less modeling with ancient genomic data. We here newly reported genome-wide genotyping data from 207 present-day Han Chinese and Hmong-Mien-speaking She people from Fujian and Taiwan, southeast China. We co-analyzed with 66 early-Neolithic to Iron-Age ancient Fujian and Taiwan individuals obtained from literature to explore the genetic continuity and admixture based on the genetic variations of high-resolution time transect. We found the genetic differentiation between northern and southern East Asians defined by a north-south East Asian genetic cline and the studied southern East Asians were clustered in the southern end of this cline. We also found that southeastern coastal continental modern East Asians harbored the genetic differentiation with other southern Tai-Kadai, Hmong-Mien, Austronesian and Austroasiatic speakers, as well as geographically close Neolithic-to-Iron Age populations, but relatedly close to post-Neolithic Yellow River ancients, which suggested the influence of southward gene flow on the modern southern coastal gene pool. Besides, we also identified one new Hmong-Mien genetic cline in East Asia with the coastal Fujian She localizing at the intersection position between Hmong-Mien and Han clines in the principal component analysis. She people show stronger genetic affinity with southern East Asian indigenous populations with the main ancestry deriving from Hanben-related populations. The southeastern Han Chinese could be modeled with the primary ancestry deriving from the group related to the Yellow River Basin millet farmers and the remaining from groups related to southeastern ancient indigenous rice farmers, which was consistent with the northern China origin of modern southeastern Han Chinese and in line with the historically and archaeologically attested southward migrations of Han people and their ancestors. Interestingly, f4-statistics and three-way admixture model results showed both coastal ancient sources related to Austronesian speakers and inland ancient sources related to Austroasiatic speakers complexed the modern observed fine-scale genetic structure here. Our estimated north-south admixture time ranges based on the decay of the linkage disequilibrium spanned from the Bronze age to historic periods, suggesting the recent large-scale population migrations and subsequent admixture participated in the formation of modern Han in Southeast Asia.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.