henhaobio
Sign in

Abstract

Southern China is the birthplace of rice-cultivating agriculture, different language families, and human migrations that facilitated these cultural diffusions. The fine-scale demographic history in situ, however, remains unclear. To comprehensively cover the genetic diversity in East and Southeast Asia, we generated genome-wide SNP data from 211 present-day Southern Chinese and co-analyzed them with more than 1,200 ancient and modern genomes. We discover that the previously described Southern East Asian or Yangtze River Farmer lineage is monophyletic but not homogeneous, comprising four regionally differentiated sub-ancestries. These ancestries are respectively responsible for the transmission of Austronesian, Kra-Dai, Hmong-Mien, and Austroasiatic languages and their original homelands successively distributed from East to West in Southern China. Multiple phylogenetic analyses support that the earliest living branching among East Asian-related populations is First Americans ([~]27,700 BP), followed by the pre-LGM differentiation between Northern and Southern East Asians ([~]23,400 BP) and the pre-Neolithic split between Coastal and Inland Southern East Asians ([~]16,400 BP). In North China, distinct coastal and inland routes of south-to-north gene flow had established by the Holocene, and further migration and admixture formed the genetic profile of Sinitic speakers by [~]4,000 BP. Four subsequent massive migrations finalized the complete genetic structure of present-day Southern Chinese. First, a southward Sinitic migration and the admixture with Kra-Dai speakers formed the Sinitic Cline. Second, a bi-directional admixture between Hmong-Mien and Kra-Dai speakers gave rise to the Hmong-Mien Cline in the interior of South China between [~]2,000 and [~]1,000 BP. Third, a southwestward migration of Kra-Dai speakers in recent [~]2,000 years impacted the genetic profile for the majority of Mainland Southeast Asians. Finally, an admixture between Tibeto-Burman incomers and indigenous Austroasiatic speakers formed the Tibeto-Burman speakers in Southeast Asia by [~]2,000 BP.

Abstract summary

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC 4.0

Genome-wide SNPs from 211 Southern Chinese, analysed with over 1,200 ancient and modern genomes, split the Yangtze River Farmer lineage into four language-linked sub-ancestries and date later migrations.

Southern China is where rice farming and several language families began, yet its fine-scale population history in place has stayed unresolved. New genome-wide data from the region, analysed together with more than 1,200 ancient and modern genomes, resolves the Yangtze River Farmer lineage into regional components and attaches dates to the splits and migrations behind them.

Key results

  1. SuggestedThe Southern East Asian, or Yangtze River Farmer, lineage comes out monophyletic but internally structured, with four regionally separated sub-ancestries whose inferred homelands run east to west and each of which is tied to one language family.

    Inferred from new genome-wide SNP data on 211 present-day Southern Chinese analysed with more than 1,200 ancient and modern genomes; the four families named are Austronesian, Kra-Dai, Hmong-Mien and Austroasiatic. · Abstract

  2. SuggestedPhylogenetic analyses put First Americans as the earliest living branch among East Asian-related populations, then a north-south East Asian split before the Last Glacial Maximum, then a coastal-inland split in the south before the Neolithic.

    Dated at ~27,700 BP, ~23,400 BP and ~16,400 BP respectively; the abstract names no confidence intervals, calibration or inference method. · Abstract

  3. SuggestedFour later movements are read as completing the present-day genetic structure of Southern Chinese: southward Sinitic migration with Kra-Dai admixture, bidirectional Hmong-Mien and Kra-Dai mixing inland, a southwestward Kra-Dai spread into Mainland Southeast Asia, and Tibeto-Burman mixing with Austroasiatic speakers.

    Dated to ~2,000-1,000 BP for the Hmong-Mien cline, the recent ~2,000 years for the Kra-Dai spread and ~2,000 BP for the Tibeto-Burman admixture, after Sinitic speakers' profile formed by ~4,000 BP. · Abstract

Methods, data and reproducibility

Genome-wide SNP genotypes were generated for 211 present-day individuals from Southern China and analysed jointly with more than 1,200 ancient and modern genomes; multiple phylogenetic analyses order and date the splits, and inferred admixture accounts for the clines in present-day structure.

  • Newly generated genome-wide SNP data from present-day Southern Chinese individuals · human · n = 211
  • Ancient and modern genomes co-analysed to cover East and Southeast Asian diversity · human · n = more than 1,200
Reproducibility gaps
No genotype release, data accession or analysis code is named in the abstract.
Limitations (2)
  • Split and admixture dates are single point estimates with no confidence intervals, calibration assumptions or named inference method in the abstract. · noted in this summary
  • Each ancestry component is assigned to a language family, a genetics-to-linguistics mapping asserted without supporting statistics or an alternative model being ruled out here. · noted in this summary

Read this if you work on East and Southeast Asian population history and want dated splits plus admixture clines tying ancestry components to language families.

Citations
54

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWang '21He '22Xia '19Lipson '18He '23Wang '20
82% semantic matchGenetics
Mengge Wang, Guanglin He, Xing Zou+16 more·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2021· 2 citations