bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Genomic Insights into the Demographic History of Southern Chinese
Xiu‐Feng HuangiD, Zi‐Yang XiaiD, Xiaoyun BiniD, Guanglin HeiD, Jianxin GuoiD, Chao‐Wen LiniD, Lianfei Yin, Jing ZhaoiD, Zhuofei Ma, Fuwei Ma, Yingxiang LiiD, Rong HuiD, Lan‐Hai WeiiD, Chuan‐Chao WangiD
Abstract
Southern China is the birthplace of rice-cultivating agriculture, different language families, and human migrations that facilitated these cultural diffusions. The fine-scale demographic history in situ, however, remains unclear. To comprehensively cover the genetic diversity in East and Southeast Asia, we generated genome-wide SNP data from 211 present-day Southern Chinese and co-analyzed them with more than 1,200 ancient and modern genomes. We discover that the previously described Southern East Asian or Yangtze River Farmer lineage is monophyletic but not homogeneous, comprising four regionally differentiated sub-ancestries. These ancestries are respectively responsible for the transmission of Austronesian, Kra-Dai, Hmong-Mien, and Austroasiatic languages and their original homelands successively distributed from East to West in Southern China. Multiple phylogenetic analyses support that the earliest living branching among East Asian-related populations is First Americans ([~]27,700 BP), followed by the pre-LGM differentiation between Northern and Southern East Asians ([~]23,400 BP) and the pre-Neolithic split between Coastal and Inland Southern East Asians ([~]16,400 BP). In North China, distinct coastal and inland routes of south-to-north gene flow had established by the Holocene, and further migration and admixture formed the genetic profile of Sinitic speakers by [~]4,000 BP. Four subsequent massive migrations finalized the complete genetic structure of present-day Southern Chinese. First, a southward Sinitic migration and the admixture with Kra-Dai speakers formed the Sinitic Cline. Second, a bi-directional admixture between Hmong-Mien and Kra-Dai speakers gave rise to the Hmong-Mien Cline in the interior of South China between [~]2,000 and [~]1,000 BP. Third, a southwestward migration of Kra-Dai speakers in recent [~]2,000 years impacted the genetic profile for the majority of Mainland Southeast Asians. Finally, an admixture between Tibeto-Burman incomers and indigenous Austroasiatic speakers formed the Tibeto-Burman speakers in Southeast Asia by [~]2,000 BP.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: fine-mapping
- approach: statistical model
Abstract summary
Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC 4.0
Genome-wide SNPs from 211 Southern Chinese, analysed with over 1,200 ancient and modern genomes, split the Yangtze River Farmer lineage into four language-linked sub-ancestries and date later migrations.
Southern China is where rice farming and several language families began, yet its fine-scale population history in place has stayed unresolved. New genome-wide data from the region, analysed together with more than 1,200 ancient and modern genomes, resolves the Yangtze River Farmer lineage into regional components and attaches dates to the splits and migrations behind them.
Key results
SuggestedThe Southern East Asian, or Yangtze River Farmer, lineage comes out monophyletic but internally structured, with four regionally separated sub-ancestries whose inferred homelands run east to west and each of which is tied to one language family.
Inferred from new genome-wide SNP data on 211 present-day Southern Chinese analysed with more than 1,200 ancient and modern genomes; the four families named are Austronesian, Kra-Dai, Hmong-Mien and Austroasiatic. · Abstract
SuggestedPhylogenetic analyses put First Americans as the earliest living branch among East Asian-related populations, then a north-south East Asian split before the Last Glacial Maximum, then a coastal-inland split in the south before the Neolithic.
Dated at ~27,700 BP, ~23,400 BP and ~16,400 BP respectively; the abstract names no confidence intervals, calibration or inference method. · Abstract
SuggestedFour later movements are read as completing the present-day genetic structure of Southern Chinese: southward Sinitic migration with Kra-Dai admixture, bidirectional Hmong-Mien and Kra-Dai mixing inland, a southwestward Kra-Dai spread into Mainland Southeast Asia, and Tibeto-Burman mixing with Austroasiatic speakers.
Dated to ~2,000-1,000 BP for the Hmong-Mien cline, the recent ~2,000 years for the Kra-Dai spread and ~2,000 BP for the Tibeto-Burman admixture, after Sinitic speakers' profile formed by ~4,000 BP. · Abstract
Methods, data and reproducibility
Genome-wide SNP genotypes were generated for 211 present-day individuals from Southern China and analysed jointly with more than 1,200 ancient and modern genomes; multiple phylogenetic analyses order and date the splits, and inferred admixture accounts for the clines in present-day structure.
- Newly generated genome-wide SNP data from present-day Southern Chinese individuals · human · n = 211
- Ancient and modern genomes co-analysed to cover East and Southeast Asian diversity · human · n = more than 1,200
- Reproducibility gaps
- No genotype release, data accession or analysis code is named in the abstract.
Limitations (2)
- Split and admixture dates are single point estimates with no confidence intervals, calibration assumptions or named inference method in the abstract. · noted in this summary
- Each ancestry component is assigned to a language family, a genetics-to-linguistics mapping asserted without supporting statistics or an alternative model being ruled out here. · noted in this summary
Read this if you work on East and Southeast Asian population history and want dated splits plus admixture clines tying ancestry components to language families.
- Citations
- 54
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- New insights from the combined discrimination of modern/ancient genome-wide shared alleles and haplotypes: Differentiated demographic history reconstruction of Tai-Kadai and Sinitic people in South China
Mengge Wang, Guanglin He, … Chuan‐Chao Wang·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2021
- The northern gene flow into southeastern East Asians inferred from genome-wide array genotyping
Guanglin He, Ying‐Xiang Li, … Chuan‐Chao Wang·Journal of Systematics and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Jan 7, 2022
- Inland-coastal bifurcation of southern East Asians revealed by Hmong-Mien genomic history
Zi‐Yang Xia, Shi Lin Yan, … Jin Li·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2019
- Ancient genomes document multiple waves of migration in Southeast Asian prehistory
Mark Lipson, Olivia Cheronet, … David Reich·SciencePeer-reviewed·May 17, 2018
- Differentiated genomic footprints and connections inferred from 440 Hmong-Mien genomes suggest their isolation and long-distance migration
Guanglin He, Jing Chen, … Mengge Wang·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2023
- The Genomic Formation of Human Populations in East Asia
Chuan‐Chao Wang, Hui‐Yuan Yeh, … David Reich·bioRxiv·Mar 25, 2020