Navigating the Unstructured by Evaluating AlphaFold's Efficacy in Predicting Missing Residues and Structural Disorder in Proteins
Abstract
This study explored the difference between predicted structure confidence and disorder detection in protein, focusing on regions with undefined structures detected as missing segments in X-ray crystallography and Cryo-EM data. Recognizing the importance of these unstructured regions for protein functionality, we examined the alignment of numerous protein sequences with their resolved or not structures. The research utilized a comprehensive PDB dataset, classifying residues into modeled, hard missing and soft missing based on their visibility in structural data. By analysis, key features were firstly determined, including confidence score pLDDT from Al-phaFold2, an advanced AI-based tool, and IUPred, a conventional disorder prediction method. Our analysis reveals that "hard missing" residues often reside in low-confidence regions, but are not exclusively associated with disorder predictions. It was assessed how effectively individual key features can distinguish between structured and unstructured data, as well as the potential benefits of combining these features for advanced machine learning applications. This approach aims to uncover varying correlations across different experimental methodologies in the latest structural data. By analyzing the relationships between predictions and experimental structures, we can more effectively identify structural targets within proteins, guiding experimental designs toward areas of potential functional significance, whether they exhibit high stability or crucial unstructured regions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Field percentile
- top 25%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Random, de novo and conserved proteins: How structure and disorder predictors perform differently
Lasse Middendorf, Lars A. Eicholt·bioRxiv·Jul 18, 2023
- Dissecting AlphaFolds Capabilities with Limited Sequence Information
Jannik Adrian Gut, Thomas Lemmin·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2024
- Balancing Speed and Precision in Protein Folding: A Comparison of AlphaFold2, ESMFold, and OmegaFold
Anna Hýsková, Eva Marsalkova, Petr Šimeček·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2026
- Novel Protein Structure Validation using PDBMine and Data Analytics Approaches
Niharika Pandala, Katherine Brown, Homayoun Valafar·bioRxiv·Feb 7, 2025
- Fold or flop: quality assessment of AlphaFold predictions on whole proteomes
Edoardo Sarti, Frédéric Cazals·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold 2 applications
M. Akdel, D. E. Pires, … P. Beltrao·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2021