Cerebral CortexNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Irrelevant Predictions: Distractor Rhythmicity Modulates Neural Encoding in Auditory Cortex
Abstract
Dynamic Attending Theory suggests that predicting the timing of upcoming sounds can assist in focusing attention towards them. However, whether similar predictive processes are also applied to background noises and assist in guiding attention away from potential distractors, remains an open question. Here we address this question by manipulating the temporal predictability of distractor sounds in a dichotic listening selective attention task. We tested the influence of distractors temporal predictability on performance and on the neural encoding of sounds, by comparing the effects of Rhythmic vs. Non-rhythmic distractors. Using Magnetoencephalography (MEG) we found that, indeed, the neural responses to both attended and distractor sounds were affected by distractors rhythmicity. Baseline activity preceding the onset of Rhythmic distractor sounds was enhanced relative to Non-rhythmic distractor sounds, and sensory response were suppressed. Moreover, when distractors were Rhythmic, responses to attended sounds were more strongly lateralized to the contra-lateral hemisphere. Behavioral performance also improved in the Rhythmic condition. These combined behavioral and neural results suggest that not only are temporal predictions formed for task-irrelevant sounds, but that these predictions bear functional significance for promoting selective attention and reducing distractibility.
- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Field percentile
- top 36%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Predicting the irrelevant: Neural effects of distractor predictability depend on load
Troby Ka‐Yan Lui, Jonas Obleser, Malte Wöstmann·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Beat-based and memory-based temporal expectations in rhythm: similar perceptual effects, different underlying mechanisms
Fleur L. Bouwer, Henkjan Honing, Heleen A. Slagter·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2020
- Auditory Attention Implements Complementary but Independent Cortical Mechanisms of Enhancement and Suppression
Max Schulz, Christopher Gundlach, … Malte Wöstmann·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2026
- What is a rhythm for the brain? The impact of contextual temporal variability on auditory perception
Pierre A Bonnet, Mathilde Bonnefond, Anne Kösem·Journal of CognitionPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2024
- The Slowest Timescales of Neural Synchronization Reveal the Strongest Influence of Auditory Distraction
David O. Sorensen, Jenna A. Sugai, … Daniel B. Polley·Frontiers in Human NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2025
- No behavioral evidence for rhythmic facilitation of perceptual discrimination
Wy Ming Lin, Djamari Oetringer, … Saskia Haegens·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 26, 2021