Reward-driven adaptation of movements requires strong recurrent basal ganglia-cortical loops
Abstract
The basal ganglia (BG) are a collection of subcortical nuclei involved in motor control, sensorimotor integration, and procedural learning. They play a key role in the acquisition and adaptation of movements, a process driven by dopamine-dependent plasticity at cortico-striatal projections, which serve as BG input. However, BG output is not necessary for executing many well-learned movements. This raises a fundamental question: how can plasticity at BG input contribute to the acquisition and adaptation of movements which execution does not require BG output? Existing models of BG function often neglect the feedback dynamics within cortico-BG-thalamo-cortical circuitry and do not capture the interaction between the cortex and BG in movement generation and adaptation. In this work, we address the above question in a theoretical model of the BG-thalamo-cortical multiregional network, incorporating anatomical, physiological, and behavioral evidence. We examine how its dynamics influence the execution and reward-based adaptation of reaching movements. We demonstrate how the BG-thalamo-cortical network can shape cortical motor output through the combination of three mechanisms: (i) the diverse dynamics emerging from its closed-loop architecture, (ii) attractor dynamics driven by recurrent cortical connections, and (iii) reinforcement learning via dopamine-dependent cortico-striatal plasticity. Our study highlights the role of the cortico-BG-thalamo-cortical feedback in efficient visuomotor adaptation. It also suggests a mechanism for early-stage acquisition of reaching movements through motor babbling. More generally, our model explains how the BG-cortical network refines motor output through its intricate closed-loop dynamics and dopamine-dependent plasticity at cortico-striatal synapses. Significance statementThe basal ganglia (BG) are essential for learning and adapting movements, yet their output is often unnecessary for executing well-learned actions. This paradox challenges existing models of BG function. Here, we present a biologically grounded model of the cortico-BG-thalamo-cortical loop, showing how this closed-loop network supports efficient motor adaptation and early movement acquisition. Our findings reveal that dopamine-driven plasticity, recurrent cortical dynamics, and feedback from the BG together shape motor output, even when BG output is not directly required for execution. This work provides a unified framework explaining how the BG-cortical circuit contributes to both learning and refinement of goal-directed actions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 31th percentile
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Adaptive learning via surprise gated attractor switching
Qin Shu He, Daniel N. Scott, … Matthew R. Nassar·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2025
- Basal ganglia contributions during the learning of a visuomotor rotation: effect of dopamine, deep brain stimulation and reinforcement
Puneet Singh, Abhishek Lenka, … Aditya Murthy·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 20, 2019
- Basal Ganglia role in learning rewarded actions and executing previously learned choices: healthy and diseased states
Garrett Mulcahy, Brady K. Atwood, Alexey S. Kuznetsov·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2020
- Thalamic integration of basal ganglia and cerebellar circuits during motor learning
Richard H. Roth, Michael A. Muniak, … Jun Ding·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2024
- Learning reweights the decision dynamics of cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic pathways from deliberation to commitment
Zhuojun Yu, Jonathan E. Rubin, Timothy Verstynen·bioRxiv·Feb 18, 2026
- Errors in action timing and inhibition facilitate learning by tuning distinct mechanisms in the underlying decision process
Kyle Dunovan, Timothy Verstynen·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2019