Human HeredityGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Identification of Influential Variants in Significant Aggregate Rare Variant Tests
Rachel Z. BlumhageniD, David A. SchwartziD, Carl D. LangefeldiD, Tasha E. FingerliniD
Abstract
IntroductionStudies that examine the role of rare variants in both simple and complex disease are increasingly common. Though the usual approach of testing rare variants in aggregate sets is more powerful than testing individual variants, it is of interest to identify the variants that are plausible drivers of the association. We present a novel method for prioritization of rare variants after a significant aggregate test by quantifying the influence of the variant on the aggregate test of association. MethodsIn addition to providing a measure used to rank variants, we use outlier detection methods to present the computationally efficient Rare Variant Influential Filtering Tool (RIFT) to identify a subset of variants that influence the disease association. We evaluated several outlier detection methods that vary based on the underlying variance measure: interquartile range (Tukey fences), median absolute deviation and standard deviation. We performed 1000 simulations for 50 regions of size 3kb and compared the true and false positive rates. We compared RIFT using the Inner Tukey to two existing methods: adaptive combination of p-values (ADA) and a Bayesian hierarchical model (BeviMed). Finally, we applied this method to data from our targeted resequencing study in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). ResultsAll outlier detection methods observed higher sensitivity to detect uncommon variants (0.001 0.03) compared to very rare variants (MAF < 0.001). For uncommon variants, RIFT had a lower median false positive rate compared to the ADA. ADA and RIFT had significantly higher true positive rates than that observed for BeviMed. When applied to two regions found previously associated with IPF including 100 rare variants, we identified six polymorphisms with the greatest evidence for influencing the association with IPF. DiscussionIn summary, RIFT has a high true positive rate while maintaining a low false positive rate for identifying polymorphisms influencing rare variant association tests. This work provides an approach to obtain greater resolution of the rare variant signals within significant aggregate sets; this information can provide an objective measure to prioritize variants for follow-up experimental studies and insight into the biological pathways involved.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Field percentile
- top 34%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficient and Flexible Integration of Variant Characteristics in Rare Variant Association Studies Using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation
Hana Sušak, Laura Serra, … Stephan Ossowski·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 19, 2021
- Selection and explosive growth may hamper the performance of rare variant association tests
Lawrence H. Uricchio, John S. Witte, Ryan D. Hernandez·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2016
- Flexibly Modeling Rare Variant Pathogenicity Improves Gene Discovery for Complex Traits
Jeremy Schwartzentruber, Petko P. Fiziev, … Kyle Kai‐How Farh·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2025
- MIRAGE: a Bayesian rare variant association analysis method incorporating functional information of variants
Shengtong Han, Xiaotong Sun, … Xin He·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 19, 2025
- Rare-variant aggregate association analysis using imputed data is a powerful approach.
Tianyi Liu, Paul Livermore Auer, … Suzanne M. Leal·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2025
- Identifying individual risk rare variants using protein structure-guided local tests (POINT)
Rachel Marceau West, Wenbin Lu, … Jung‐Ying Tzeng·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 19, 2019