Impacts of an urban sanitation intervention on fecal indicators and the prevalence of human fecal contamination in Mozambique
D. A. Holcomb, J. Knee, D. Capone, T. Sumner, Z. Adriano, R. Nala, O. Cumming, J. Brown, J. R. Stewart
Abstract
Fecal source tracking (FST) may be useful to assess pathways of fecal contamination in domestic environments and to estimate the impacts of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions in low-income settings. We measured two non-specific and two human-associated fecal indicators in water, soil, and surfaces before and after a shared latrine intervention from low-income households in Maputo, Mozambique participating in the Maputo Sanitation (MapSan) trial. Up to a quarter of households were impacted by human fecal contamination, but trends were unaffected by improvements to shared sanitation facilities. The intervention reduced E. coli gene concentrations in soil but did not impact culturable E. coli or the prevalence of human FST markers in a difference-in-differences analysis. Using a novel Bayesian hierarchical modeling approach to account for human marker diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, we revealed a high amount of uncertainty associated with human FST measurements and intervention effect estimates. The field of microbial source tracking would benefit from adding measures of diagnostic accuracy to better interpret findings, particularly when FST analyses convey insufficient information for robust inference. With improved measures, FST could help identify dominant pathways of human and animal fecal contamination in communities and guide implementation of effective interventions to safeguard health. SYNOPSISAn urban sanitation intervention had minimal and highly uncertain effects on human fecal contamination after accounting for fecal indicator sensitivity and specificity. TOC GRAPHIC/ABSTRACT ART O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=108 SRC="FIGDIR/small/432000v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@312d2dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8cf2caorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@197b549org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@fefeb3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Impact of an Urban Sanitation Intervention on Enteric Pathogen Detection in Soils
Drew Capone, David M. Berendes, … Joe M. Brown·Environmental Science & TechnologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2021
- Microbial source tracking of human and animal fecal contamination in Ecuadorian households
Kelsey J. Jesser, Viviana Albán, … Karen Lévy·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2025
- Implementation and Integration of Microbial Source Tracking in a River Watershed Monitoring Plan
E. Balleste, K. Demeter, … W. G. Meijer·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2019
- Quantitative assessment of fecal contamination in multiple environmental sample types in urban communities in Dhaka, Bangladesh using SaniPath microbial approach
N. Amin, M. Rahman, … C. L. Moe·PLOS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2019
- Metagenome-based comparisons of decay rates and host-specificity of fecal microbial communities for improved microbial source tracking
B. Suttner, B. G. Lindner, … K. T. Konstantinidis·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2021
- Can individual and integrated water, sanitation, and handwashing interventions reduce fecal contamination in the household environment? Evidence from the WASH Benefits cluster-randomized trial in rural Kenya
A. Pickering, J. Swarthout, … C. Null·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2019