Metagenome-based comparisons of decay rates and host-specificity of fecal microbial communities for improved microbial source tracking
B. Suttner, B. G. Lindner, M. Kim, R. E. Conrad, L. M. Rodriguez, L. H. Orellana, E. R. Johnston, J. K. Hatt, K. J. Zhu, J. Brown, K. T. Konstantinidis
Abstract
Fecal material in the environment is a primary source of pathogens that cause waterborne diseases and affect over a billion people worldwide. Microbial source tracking (MST) assays based on single genes (e.g., 16S rRNA) do not always provide the resolution needed to attribute fecal contamination sources. In this work, we used dialysis bag mesocosms simulating a freshwater habitat that were spiked separately with cow, pig, or human feces to monitor the decay of host-specific fecal signals over time with metagenomics, traditional qPCR, and culture-based methods. Sequencing of the host fecal communities used as inocula recovered 79 non-redundant metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) whose abundance patterns showed that the majority of the fecal community signal was not detectable in the mesocosm metagenomes after four days. Several MAGs showed high host specificity, and thus are promising candidates for biomarkers for their respective host type. Traditional qPCR methods varied in their correlation with MAG decay kinetics. Notably, the human-specific Bacteroides assay, HF183/BFDRev, consistently under-estimated fecal pollution due to not being present in all hosts and/or primer mismatches. This work provides new insights on the persistence and decay kinetics of host-specific gut microbes in the environment and identifies several MAGs as putative biomarkers for improved MST. SYNOPSISWe track cow, pig, and human fecal pollution in lake water over time with metagenomics and benchmark these novel protocols against standard culture-based and qPCR tests for water quality monitoring.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Implementation and Integration of Microbial Source Tracking in a River Watershed Monitoring Plan
E. Balleste, K. Demeter, … W. G. Meijer·bioRxiv·Jan 7, 2019
- Using Watershed Characteristics for Improving Fecal Source Identification
J. J. Hart, M. N. Jamison, … R. R. Rediske·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2022
- Novel municipal sewage-associated bacterial genomes and their potential in source tracking
B. G. Lindner, B. Suttner, … K. T. Konstantinidis·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2021
- A Novel Droplet Digital PCR Human mtDNA Assay for Global Fecal Source Tracking
K. Zhu, B. Suttner, … J. Brown·Water ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2020
- Microbial source tracking of human and animal fecal contamination in Ecuadorian households
Kelsey J. Jesser, Viviana Albán, … Karen Lévy·Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2025
- Microbial Source Tracking in the Love Creek Watershed, Delaware (USA)
C. R. Main, R. Tyler, … S. Heurta·bioRxiv·Jan 13, 2020