Overcoming toxicity: why boom-and-bust cycles are good for non-antagonistic microbes

Abstract

Antagonistic interactions are critical determinants of microbial community stability and composition, offering host benefits such as pathogen protection and providing avenues for antimicrobial control. While the ability to eliminate competitors confers an advantage to antagonistic microbes, it often incurs a fitness cost. Consequently, many microbes only produce toxins or engage in antagonistic behavior in response to specific cues like quorum sensing molecules or environmental stress. In laboratory settings, antagonistic microbes typically dominate over sensitive ones, raising the question of why both antagonistic and non-antagonistic microbes are found in natural environments and host microbiomes. Here, using both theoretical models and experiments with killer strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we show that boom-and-bust dynamics caused by temporal environmental fluctuations can favor non-antagonistic microbes that do not incur the growth rate cost of toxin production. Additionally, using control theory, we derive bounds on the competitive performance and identify optimal regulatory toxin-production strategies in various boom- and-bust environments where population dilutions occur either deterministically or stochastically over time. Our findings offer a new perspective on how both antagonistic and non-antagonistic microbes can thrive under varying environmental conditions.