A geometric-to-neural cascade for cerebral microbleed detection in susceptibility-weighted MRI
Sam BogdanoviD, Gaurav RudravaramiD, Adam M. SaundersiD, Michael E. KimiD, James D. LeFevre, Jack Charles, Stuti JainiD, Matthew SchragiD, Bennett A. LandmaniD
Abstract
Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are established imaging biomarkers of cerebral small vessel disease and are a defining feature of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), yet their automated detection in susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) remains challenging due to high false-positive rates from vessel cross-sections, iron and calcium deposits, and other hypointense mimics. We present a fully automated, three-stage cascade pipeline that combines subject-adaptive unsupervised candidate generation with two successive lightweight 3D ResNet classifiers, trained with only human-in-the-loop quality-assurance (QA) labels (yes/no per candidate) rather than dense voxel-wise segmentation masks. The candidate generation stage is performed by fitting a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to each subjects SWI intensity histogram to define an adaptive low-intensity threshold, followed by anatomical masking to exclude physiologically irrelevant regions (image edges, ventricles/CSF/choroid plexus, and cerebellum), and filters candidates by size and sphericity. The model was trained and evaluated across a nested 3x5-fold cross-validation on N = 30 subjects from a publicly available labeled microbleed dataset and a CAA cohort (11,424 CMB candidate lesions) with data augmentation during training. Stage A classifies all geometric candidates as CMB or non-CMB and Stage B refines the predicted positives to suppress false positives (cascade AUC = 0.9587, sensitivity = 0.712, specificity = 0.975, PPV = 0.676, F1 = 0.693). The cascade reduces Stage A false positives by 76.8% (888/1,157 false positives eliminated) while retaining competitive sensitivity. Inference was performed on 141 SWI scans, detecting a mean 40.3 CMBs per scan and being preferred for use in 85% of high CMB cases, as evaluated by a blinded neurologist. The inference pipeline outputs binary CMB segmentation NIfTI images and radiologist-ready QA visualizations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Using Transfer Learning for Automated Microbleed Segmentation
Mahsa Dadar, Maryna Zhernovaia, … Simon Duchesne·Frontiers in NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2022
- Early detection of white matter hyperintensities using SHIVA-WMH detector
Ami Tsuchida, Philippe Boutinaud, … Marc Joliot·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2023
- Multi-model Segmentation and Morphometric Quantification of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy in Alzheimer's Disease Whole Slide Histopathology Images
Hossein Tahmasebi Dehkordi, Afshin Bahramy, … Julia Kofler·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2026
- Combining images and anatomical knowledge to improve automated vein segmentation in MRI
Phillip G. D. Ward, Nicholas J. Ferris, … Gary F. Egan·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Oct 25, 2017
- WMH-DualTasker: A weakly-supervised deep learning model for automated white matter hyperintensities segmentation and visual rating prediction
Yilei Wu, Zijian Dong, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2025
- Automated quantification of small vessel disease brain changes on MRI predicts cognitive and functional decline
Hanna Jokinen, Juha R. Koikkalainen, … Timo Erkinjuntti·StrokePeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2019