Contrasting impacts of urban and farmland cover on flying insect biomass
C. S. Svenningsen, D. E. Bowler, S. Hecker, J. Bladt, V. Grescho, N. M. van Dam, J. Dauber, D. Eichenberg, R. Ejrnaes, C. Flojgaard, M. Frenzel, T. G. Froslev, A. J. Hansen, J. Heilmann-Clausen, Y. Huang, J. C. Larsen, J. Menger, N. L. B. M. Nayan, L. B. Pedersen, A. Richter, R. R. Dunn, A. P. Tottrup, A. Bonn
Abstract
Recent studies report declines in biomass, abundance and diversity of terrestrial insect groups. While anthropogenic land use is one likely contributor to this decline, studies assessing land cover as a driver of insect dynamics are rare and mostly restricted in spatial scale and types of land cover. In this study, we used rooftop-mounted car nets in a citizen science project ( InsectMobile) to allow for large-scale geographic sampling of flying insects across Denmark and parts of Germany. Citizen scientists sampled insects along 278 10 km routes in urban, farmland and semi-natural (grassland, wetland and forest) landscapes in the summer of 2018. We assessed the importance of local to landscape-scale effects and land use intensity by relating insect biomass to land cover in buffers of 50, 250, 500 and 1000 m along the routes. We found a negative association of urban cover and a positive association of farmland on insect biomass at a landscape-scale (1000 m buffer) in both countries. In Denmark, we also found positive effects of all semi-natural land covers, i.e. grassland (largest at the landscape-scale, 1000 m), forests (largest at intermediate scales, 250 m), and wetlands (largest at the local-scale, 50 m). The negative association of insect biomass with urban land cover and positive association with farmland were not clearly modified by any variable associated with land use intensity. Our results show that land cover has an impact on flying insect biomass with the magnitude of this effect varying across spatial scales. Since we consistently found negative effects of urban land cover, our findings highlight the need for the conservation of semi-natural areas, such as wetlands, grasslands and forests, in Europe.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Temperature drives variation in flying insect biomass across a German malaise trap network
E. A. R. Welti, P. Zajicek, … P. Haase·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2021
- Insect biomass of protected habitats under the impact of arable farming in Germany
R. Muehlethaler, S. Koethe, … G. U. C. Lehmann·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2023
- A hidden biomass flow - 10,000 tons of insects fly over Switzerland
Félix Liechti, Birgen Haest, Silke Bauer·bioRxiv·Mar 2, 2026
- InsectChange: Comment
L. Gaume, M. Desquilbet·bioRxiv·Jun 17, 2023
- A rapid ecological assessment for necrophagous flies (Diptera, Calyptratae) in a mosaic landscape of the Colombian Andes
E. Amat, C. A. Medina·bioRxiv·Jul 24, 2020
- Reducing ploughing promotes ground-nesting flying insects
Christopher Hellerich, Michael P. D. Garratt, … Anne‐Christine Mupepele·Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentPeer-reviewed·Mar 28, 2026