Pitch discrimination performance of ferrets and humans on a go/no-go task.
Kerry MM Walker, Amelia Davies, Jennifer K Bizley, Jan WH Schnupp, Andrew J King
Abstract
Animal models are widely used to examine the neurophysiological basis of human pitch perception, and it is therefore important to understand the similarities and differences in pitch processing across species. Pitch discrimination performance is usually measured using two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) procedures in humans and go/no-go tasks in animals, potentially confounding human-to-animal comparisons. We have previously shown that pitch discrimination thresholds of ferrets on a 2AFC task are markedly poorer than those reported for go/no-go tasks in other non-human species (Walker et al., 2009). To better compare the pitch discrimination performance of ferret with other species, here we measure pitch change detection thresholds of ferrets and humans on a common, appetitive go/no-go task design. We found that ferrets pitch thresholds were ~10 times larger than that of humans on the go/no-go task, and were within the range of thresholds reported in other non-human species. Interestingly, ferrets thresholds were 100 times larger than human thresholds on a 2AFC pitch discrimination task using the same stimuli. These results emphasize that sensory discrimination thresholds can differ across tasks, particularly for non-human animals. Performance on our go/no-go task is likely to reflect different neurobiological processes than that on our 2AFC task, as the former required the subjects only to detect a pitch change while the latter required them to label the direction of the pitch change.\n\nABBREVIATIONS\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LIPitch discrimination thresholds of ferrets were 10 times larger than those of humans on a go/no-go task\nC_LIO_LIFerrets pitch thresholds are similar to those reported for a range of other mammals\nC_LIO_LIPitch thresholds of ferrets, but not humans, were drastically better on the go/no-go task than a 2AFC task using the same stimuli\nC_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Pitch perception is adapted to species-specific cochlear filtering
Kerry M. M. Walker, Ray Gonzalez, … Andrew J. King·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2018
- Distinct higher-order representations of natural sounds in human and ferret auditory cortex
Agnès Landemard, Célian Bimbard, … Yves Boubenec·eLifePeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2021
- Gradient boosted decision trees reveal nuances of auditory discrimination behaviour
Carla Griffiths, Jules M Lebert, … Jennifer K. Bizley·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 16, 2024
- Auditory regularity detection in the ferret
Katarina C. Poole, Maria Chait A, Jennifer K. Bizley·The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2026
- Pitch selectivity in ferret auditory cortex
Veronica Tarka, Quentin Gaucher, Kerry M. M. Walker·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2026
- Sound-evoked facial motion in ferrets: evidence for species differences in sensorimotor coupling
Mathilde Martin, Yves Boubenec·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2026