bioRxivAnimal Behavior & Cognition
Architectural experience: clarifying its central components and their relation to core affect with a set of first-person-view videos
Abstract
When studying architectural experience in the lab, it is of paramount importance to use a proxy as close to real-world experience as possible. Whilst still images visually describe real spaces, and virtual reality allows for dynamic movement, each medium lacks the alternative attribute. To merge these benefits, we created and validated a novel dataset of valenced videos of first-person-view travel through built environments. This dataset was then used to clarify the relationship of core affect (valence and arousal) and architectural experience. Specifically, we verified the relationship between valence and fascination, coherence, and hominess - three key psychological dimensions of architectural experience which have previously been shown to explain aesthetic ratings of built environments. We also found that arousal is only significantly correlated with fascination, and that both are embedded in a relationship with spatial complexity and unusualness. These results help to clarify the nature of fascination, and to distinguish it from coherence and hominess when it comes to core affect. Moreover, these results demonstrate the utility of a video dataset of affect-laden spaces for understanding architectural experience. Highlights- Developed a video database of first-person-view journeys through built environments - We explored how core affect and architectural experience relate through the videos - Previous results are supported: valence ties to fascination, coherence and hominess - Arousal correlates only with fascination, and not coherence or hominess - Arousal and fascination are tied to spatial complexity and unusualness
- assay: imaging
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: dimensionality reduction
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Brain dynamics during architectural experience: prefrontal and hippocampal regions track aesthetics and spatial complexity
Lara Gregorians, Eva Zita Patai, … Hugo J. Spiers·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2025
- Architectural experience influences the processing of others' body expressions
Paolo Presti, Gaia Maria Galasso, … Giovanni Vecchiato·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 2, 2023
- A scene with an invisible wall - navigational experience shapes visual scene representation
Donald Shi Pui Li, Jiayu Shao, … Soojin Park·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2025
- From pixels to pleasure: visual features explain dynamic aesthetic experiences across distinct movie content
Mustafa Alperen Ekinci, Nina Bühlmann, DANIEL H. KAISER·bioRxiv·Apr 16, 2026
- Embodied Spatial Knowledge Acquisition in Immersive Virtual Reality: Comparison to Map Exploration
Sabine U. König, Ashima Keshava, … Peter König B·Frontiers in Virtual RealityPeer-reviewed·Mar 2, 2021
- How the characteristics of a virtual environment affects the perception of travel distance through it
Ambika Bansal, Meaghan McManus, Laurence R. Harris·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2026