Architectural experience influences the processing of others' body expressions
Paolo PrestiiD, Gaia Maria Galasso, Davide RuzzoniD, Pietro AvanziniiD, Fausto CaruanaiD, Giacomo RizzolattiiD, Giovanni VecchiatoiD
Abstract
The interplay between space and cognition is a crucial issue in Neuroscience leading to the development of multiple research fields. However, the relationship between architectural space, the movement of the inhabitants and their interactions has been too often neglected, failing to provide a unifying view of architectures capacity to modulate social cognition broadly. We bridge this gap by requesting participants to judge avatars emotional expression (high vs. low arousal) at the end of their promenade inside high- or low-arousing architectures. Stimuli were presented in virtual reality to ensure a dynamic, naturalistic experience. High-density EEG was recorded to assess the neural responses to the avatars presentation. Observing highly aroused avatars increased Late Positive Potentials (LPP), in line with previous evidence. Strikingly, 250 ms before the occurrence of the LPP, P200 amplitude increased due to the experience of low-arousing architectures paralleling increased subjective arousal reports and fixation times on the avatars head. Source localization highlighted a contribution of the right dorsal premotor cortex to both P200 and LPP. In conclusion, the immersive and dynamic architectural experience modulates human social cognition. In addition, the motor system plays a role in processing architecture and body expressions proving how the space and social cognition interplay is rooted in common neural substrates. This study demonstrates that the manipulation of mere architectural space is sufficient to influence human behavior in social interactions. Significance StatementIn the last thirty years the motor system has been recognized as a fundamental neural machinery for spatial and social cognition, making worthwhile the investigation of the interplay between architecture and social behavior. Here, we show that the motor system participates in the others body expression processing in two stages: the earliest influenced by the dynamic architectural experience, the latter modulated by the actual physical characteristics. These findings highlight the existence of motor neural substrates common to spatial and social cognition, with the architectural space exerting an early and possibly adapting effect on the later social experience. Since mere architectural forms influence human behavior, a proper spatial design could thus facilitate everyday social interactions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sensory-motor brain dynamics reflect architectural affordances
Zakaria Djebbara, Lars Brorson Fich, … Klaus Gramann·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2019
- The bodily appearance of a virtual partner affects the activity of the action observation and action monitoring systems in a minimally interactive task
Ugo Giulio Pesci, Quentin Moreau, … Matteo Candidi·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2025
- Architectural experience: clarifying its central components and their relation to core affect with a set of first-person-view videos
L. Gregorians, P. F. Velasco, … H. J. Spiers·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2022
- Brain dynamics during architectural experience: prefrontal and hippocampal regions track aesthetics and spatial complexity
Lara Gregorians, Eva Zita Patai, … Hugo J. Spiers·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2025
- Architecture shapes event boundaries: Theta dynamics of event segmentation during spatial transitions
Mahaut Dumesnil, Nulvin Djebbara-Bozo, Zakaria Djebbara·Brain and EnvironmentPeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2026
- Bodily Action Shapes Spatial Representation: Evidence from Virtual Reality, Sensory Augmentation and Map Learning