genesisGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Using human sequencing to guide craniofacial research.
Ryan P. LiegeliD, Erin Finnerty, Lauren E. Blizzard, Andrew DiStasio, Robert B. HufnageliD, Howard M. SaaliD, Kristen Lipscomb SundiD, Cynthia A. ProwsiD, Rolf W. StottmanniD
Abstract
A recent convergence of technological innovations has re-energized the ability to apply genetics to research in human craniofacial development. Next-generation exome and whole genome sequencing have dropped in price significantly making it relatively trivial to sequence and analyze patients and families with congenital craniofacial anomalies. A concurrent revolution in genome editing with the use of the CRISPR-Cas9 system enables the rapid generation of animal models, including mouse, which can precisely recapitulate human variants. Here we summarize the choices currently available to the research community. We illustrate this approach with the study of a family with a novel craniofacial syndrome with dominant inheritance pattern. The genomic analysis suggest a causal variant in AMOTL1 which we modeled in mice. We also made a novel deletion allele of Amotl1. Our results indicate that Amotl1 is not required in the mouse for survival to weaning. Mice carrying the variant identified in the human sequencing studies, however, do not survive to weaning in normal ratios. The cause of death is not understood for these mice complicating our conclusions about the pathogenicity in the index patient. Thus, we highlight some of the powerful opportunities and confounding factors confronting current craniofacial genetic research.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Field percentile
- top 40%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Examining craniofacial variation among crispant and mutant zebrafish models of human skeletal diseases
Kelly M. Diamond, Abigail E. Burtner, … A. Murat Maga·Journal of AnatomyPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2023
- Genetic Analysis and Functional Assessment of a TGFBR2 Variant in Micrognathia and Cleft Palate
JES-Rite Michaels, Paul P. R. Iyyanar, … Rolf W. Stottmann·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jun 9, 2025
- High Resolution Epigenomic Atlas of Early Human Craniofacial Development
Andrea Scarpa Wilderman, Jennifer VanOudenhove, … Justin L. Cotney·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2018
- Knocking-out the human face genes TBX15 and PAX1 in mice alters facial and other physical morphology
Qian Yu, Ziyi Xiong, … Fan Liu·bioRxiv·May 26, 2021
- A dysmorphic mouse model reveals developmental interactions of chondrocranium and dermatocranium
Susan M. Motch Perrine, M. Kathleen Pitirri, … Joan T. Richtsmeier·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2022
- Neanderthal-derived variants shape craniofacial enhancer activity at a human disease locus
Kirsty Uttley, Hannah J Juellig, … Hannah K. Long·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025