Sign in
BioinformaticsbioRxiv
Preprint

Ark-ADMET: endpoint-specific selection of molecular representations and hyperparameters for gradient-boosted ADMET models under the Therapeutics Data Commons benchmark protocol

Yuzhu Shi, Haoxi Luo, Feng Liu, Simiao Zhao

Abstract

Typical submissions to the Therapeutics Data Commons (TDC) absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) benchmark leaderboard apply a single architecture and a single feature representation across all 22 endpoints, despite substantial heterogeneity in evaluation metric, training-set size, and class balance. Rather than proposing a new architecture, we show that endpoint-specific selection of molecular representations and CatBoost hyperparameters, carried out under the official TDC ADMET benchmark protocol, is a competitive alternative to that uniform recipe. For each endpoint, a fixed CatBoost backbone was paired with configurations chosen from a common candidate set comprising published fingerprints and physicochemical descriptors, truncated three-dimensional PaDEL descriptors, frozen graph isomorphism network (GIN) and MiniMol embeddings, and a convex combination with a shallow network trained on the MiniMol embedding alone. All feature and hyperparameter choices were made on an internal scaffold validation split under a prespecified strict-improvement rule. Against a frozen snapshot of the public leaderboard, the resulting Ark-ADMET family of 22 endpoint-specific models matched or exceeded the best previously listed score on 7 of 21 rankable endpoints and strictly exceeded it on 3. All selected configurations retain the baseline fingerprint-and-descriptor block; optional components differ across endpoints. Taken together, these results show that competitive performance on this benchmark can be achieved without a new architecture or a single optional representation shared across all endpoints.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.