bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Is Inappropriate Pulse Timing Responsible for Poor Binaural Hearing with Cochlear Implants?
Jan W. H. SchnuppiD, Sarah BuchholziD, Alexa N BuckiD, Henrike Budig, Lakshay KhuranaiD, Nicole Roßkothen-KuhliD
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) have restored enough of a sense of hearing to around one million severely hearing impaired patients to enable speech understanding in quiet. However, several aspects of hearing with CIs remain very poor. This includes a severely limited ability of CI patients to make use of interaural time difference (ITD) cues for spatial hearing and noise reduction. A major cause for this poor ITD sensitivity could be that current clinical devices fail to deliver ITD information in a manner that is accessible to the auditory pathway. CI processors measure the envelopes of incoming sounds and then stimulate the auditory nerve with electrical pulse trains which are amplitude modulated to reflect incoming sound envelopes. The timing of the pulses generated by the devices is largely or entirely independent of the incoming sounds. Consequently, bilateral CIs (biCIs) provide veridical envelope (ENV) ITDs but largely or entirely replace the "fine structure" ITDs that naturally occur in sounds with completely arbitrary electrical pulse timing (PT) ITDs. To assess the extent to which this matters, we devised experiments that measured the sensitivity of deafened rats to precisely and independently controlled PT and ENV ITDs for a variety of different CI pulse rates and envelope shapes. We observed that PT ITDs completely dominate ITD perception, while the sensitivity to ENV ITDs was almost negligible in comparison. This strongly suggests that the confusing yet powerful PT ITDs that contemporary clinical devices deliver to biCI patients may be a major cause of poor binaural hearing outcomes with biCIs. Significance StatementCIs deliver spectro-temporal envelopes, including speech formants, to severely deaf patients, but they do little to cater to the brains ability to process temporal sound features with sub-millisecond precision. CIs "sample" sound envelope signals rapidly and accurately, and thus provide information which should make it possible in principle for CI listeners to detect envelope ITDs in a similar way to normal listeners. However, here we demonstrate through behavioral experiments on CI implanted rats trained to detect sub-millisecond ITDs that pulse timing ITDs completely dominate binaural hearing. This provides the strongest confirmation to date that the arbitrary pulse timing widely used in current clinical CIs is a critical obstacle to good binaural hearing through prosthetic devices.
- Citations
- 3
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Envelope and Pulse Timing Interaural Time Differences in Cochlear Implanted Rats with Different Hearing Experiences
Shiyi Fang, T. Fleiner, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2026
- Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps
Alexa N Buck, Sarah Buchholz, … Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2023
- Microsecond Interaural Time Difference Discrimination Restored by Cochlear Implants After Neonatal Deafness
Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl, Alexa N Buck, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2021
- Interactions of Interaural Time and Level Differences in Spatial Hearing with Cochlear Implants
Sarah Buchholz, Susan Arndt, … Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl·Advanced SciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2025
- Best Cochlear Locations for Delivering Interaural Timing Cues in Electric Hearing
Agudemu Borjigin, Stephen R. Dennison, … Ruth Y. Litovsky·Communications MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2026
- Interaural level difference sensitivity in neonatally deafened rats fitted with bilateral cochlear implants
Sarah Buchholz, Jan W. H. Schnupp, … Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2024