Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps
Alexa N BuckiD, Sarah BuchholziD, Jan W. H. SchnuppiD, Nicole Roßkothen-KuhliD
Abstract
BackgroundSpatial hearing remains one of the major challenges for bilateral cochlear implant (biCI) users, and early deaf patients in particular are often completely insensitive to interaural time differences (ITDs) delivered through biCIs. One popular hypothesis is that this may be due to a lack of early binaural experience. However, we have recently shown that neonatally deafened rats fitted with biCIs in adulthood quickly learn to discriminate ITDs as well as their normal hearing litter mates, and perform an order of magnitude better than human biCI users. MethodsOur unique behaving biCI rat model allows us to investigate other possible limiting factors of prosthetic binaural hearing, such as the effect of stimulus pulse rate and envelope shape. Previous work has indicated that ITD sensitivity may decline substantially at the high pulse rates often used in clinical practice. We therefore measured behavioral ITD thresholds in neonatally deafened, adult implanted biCI rats to pulse trains of 50, 300, 900 and 1800 pulses per second (pps), with either rectangular or Hanning window envelopes. ResultsOur rats exhibited very high sensitivity to ITDs at pulse rates up to 900 pps for both envelope shapes, similar to those in common clinical use. However, ITD sensitivity declined to near zero at 1800 pps, for both Hanning and rectangular windowed pulse trains. ConclusionsCurrent clinical cochlear implant (CI) processors are often set to pulse rates [≥]900 pps, but ITD sensitivity in human CI listeners has been reported to decline sharply above [~]300 pps. Our results suggest that the relatively poor ITD sensitivity seen at >300 pps in human CI users may not reflect the hard upper limit of biCI ITD performance in the mammalian auditory pathway. Perhaps with training or better CI strategies good binaural hearing may be achievable at pulse rates high enough to allow good sampling of speech envelopes while delivering usable ITDs.
- Citations
- 17
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Envelope and Pulse Timing Interaural Time Differences in Cochlear Implanted Rats with Different Hearing Experiences
Shiyi Fang, T. Fleiner, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2026
- Is Inappropriate Pulse Timing Responsible for Poor Binaural Hearing with Cochlear Implants?
Jan W. H. Schnupp, Sarah Buchholz, … Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2023
- Interaural level difference sensitivity in neonatally deafened rats fitted with bilateral cochlear implants
Sarah Buchholz, Jan W. H. Schnupp, … Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2024
- Microsecond Interaural Time Difference Discrimination Restored by Cochlear Implants After Neonatal Deafness
Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl, Alexa N Buck, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2021
- Interaural Time Difference Tuning in the Rat Inferior Colliculus is Predictive of Behavioral Sensitivity
Kongyan Li, Vani G. Rajendran, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2021
- Interactions of Interaural Time and Level Differences in Spatial Hearing with Cochlear Implants
Sarah Buchholz, Susan Arndt, … Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl·Advanced SciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2025