Interactions of Interaural Time and Level Differences in Spatial Hearing with Cochlear Implants
Sarah BuchholziD, Susan ArndtiD, Jan W. H. SchnuppiD, Nicole Roßkothen-KuhliD
Abstract
Normally hearing humans can localize sound sources quite accurately, with minimum audible angles as small as 1{degrees}. To achieve this, our auditory pathways combine information from multiple acoustic cues, including interaural time and interaural level differences (ITDs and ILDs). Patients relying on cochlear implants (CIs) to hear the world cannot match normal performance. These deficits are most pronounced in patients with little or no hearing experience early in life, and they appear to result from an impaired sensitivity to ITDs, but not to ILDs. However, little is known about how ITD and ILD sensitivities develop and interact in an early deafened auditory system shortly after CI implantation. We fitted neonatally deafened rats with bilateral CIs, and, providing informative ITDs and ILDs from stimulation onset, trained them to lateralize CI stimuli. These animals were exquisitely sensitive to both ILDs and ITDs of CI stimulus pulses, and combined information from both cues in a weighted sum. Importantly, ITDs are weighted heavily in our CI rats, such that only very modest ITDs pointing in one direction can confound quite large ILDs pointing in the opposite direction. This underlines the importance of informative ITDs for maximizing the potential for spatial hearing with CI devices. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=181 SRC="FIGDIR/small/635454v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (36K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@15ee6e2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1881bd4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@db17c7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f62f2f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 28th percentile
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Microsecond Interaural Time Difference Discrimination Restored by Cochlear Implants After Neonatal Deafness
Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl, Alexa N Buck, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2021
- Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Envelope and Pulse Timing Interaural Time Differences in Cochlear Implanted Rats with Different Hearing Experiences
Shiyi Fang, T. Fleiner, … Jan W. H. Schnupp·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 22, 2026
- Interaural level difference sensitivity in neonatally deafened rats fitted with bilateral cochlear implants
Sarah Buchholz, Jan W. H. Schnupp, … Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2024
- Is Inappropriate Pulse Timing Responsible for Poor Binaural Hearing with Cochlear Implants?
Jan W. H. Schnupp, Sarah Buchholz, … Nicole Roßkothen-Kuhl·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2023
- Chronic Bilateral Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Early-Deaf Rabbits Restores Neural Binaural Sensitivity
Woongsang Sunwoo, Bertrand Delgutte, Yoojin Chung·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2021
- Best Cochlear Locations for Delivering Interaural Timing Cues in Electric Hearing
Agudemu Borjigin, Stephen R. Dennison, … Ruth Y. Litovsky·Communications MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 10, 2026