Scientific DataGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Annotation of 200 Insect Genomes with BRAKER for Consistent Comparisons across Species
Abstract
The annotation of genomes lags behind their sequencing and assembly. For example, of 5,092 insect species in GenBank, as one of the most widely used databases, only 375 currently have annotated genomes within this database. Additionally, species that were previously annotated can benefit from reannotation using RNA-Seq and protein data that have been added since their last annotation, as well as from state-of-the-art annotation methods, whose accuracy has improved. Heterogeneous annotations performed with different tools and protein databases can introduce artifactual differences when comparing gene sets or gene structures between species. Recently, the BRAKER3 annotation pipeline was introduced that integrates evidence from RNA-Seq and from a protein database. It was benchmarked as one of the most accurate annotation methods. Here, we introduce an automated genome annotation workflow that allows to annotate a list of species with BRAKER3 and VARUS for RNA-Seq retrieval, or in the absence of transcriptome data, with BRAKER2, with minimal manual intervention. We selected a diverse set of 200 insect species from different families, including 85 species previously lacking annotations in GenBank. Using currently available RNA-Seq and protein sequence data, we applied our automated workflow to annotate these genomes and conducted downstream analyses typically performed in comparative genomics studies. We present the resulting gene structures, protein sequences, gene ontology terms, orthologous gene groups and a species tree.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: protein sequence
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: clustering
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- BRAKER3: Fully Automated Genome Annotation Using RNA-Seq and Protein Evidence with GeneMark-ETP, AUGUSTUS and TSEBRA
Lars Gabriel, Tomáš Brůna, … Mario Stanke·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2024
- Workflows for rapid functional annotation of diverse arthropod genomes
Surya Saha, Amanda M. Cooksey, … Fiona McCarthy·InsectsPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2021
- OMAnnotator: a novel approach to building an annotated consensus genome sequence
Sadé Bates, Christophe Dessimoz, Yannis Nevers·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Building better genome annotations across the tree of life
Adam H. Freedman, Timothy B. Sackton·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- Systematic functional annotation workflow for insects
Hidemasa U. Bono, Takuma Sakamoto, … Hiroko Tabunoki·InsectsPeer-reviewed·Jun 27, 2022
- BRAKER2: Automatic Eukaryotic Genome Annotation with GeneMark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS Supported by a Protein Database
Tomáš Brůna, Katharina J. Hoff, … Mark Yu. Borodovsky·NAR Genomics and BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2021