Illuminating women’s hidden contribution to the foundation of theoretical population genetics
Samantha Kristin Dung, Andrea López, Ezequiel Lopez Barragan, Rochelle-Jan ReyesiD, Ricky Thu, Edgar Castellanos, Francisca Catalan, Emilia Huerta Sanchez, Rori V. RohlfsiD
Abstract
Plentiful evidence shows an historic and continuing gender gap in participation and success in scientific research. However, less attention has been directed at clarifying obscured contributions of women to science. The lack of visible women role models (particularly in computational fields) contributes to a reduced sense of belonging and retention among women. We seek to counteract this cycle by illuminating the contribution of women programmers to the foundation of our own fields--population and evolutionary genetics. We consider past acknowledged programmers (APs), who developed, ran, and sometimes analyzed the results of early computer programs. Due to authorship norms at the time, these programmers were credited in the acknowledgments sections of manuscripts, rather than being recognized as authors. For example, one acknowledgement reads \"I thanks Mrs. M. Wu for help with the numerical work, and in particular for computing table I.\". We identified APs in Theoretical Population Biology articles published between 1970 and 1990. While only 7% of authors were women, 43% of APs were women. This significant difference (p = 4.0x10-10) demonstrates a substantial proportion of womens contribution to foundational computational population genetics has been unrecognized. The proportion of women APs, as well as number of APs decreased over time. These observations correspond to the masculinization of computer programming, and the shifting of programming responsibilities to individuals credited as authors (likely graduate students). Finally, we note recurrent APs who contributed to several highly-cited manuscripts. We conclude that, while previously overlooked, historically, women have made substantial contributions to computational biology.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Gender disparity in computational biology research publications
K. S. Bonham, M. I. Stefan·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2016
- Differential correction of gender imbalance for top-cited scientists across scientific subfields over time
J. Ioannidis, K. Boyack, … J. Baas·bioRxiv·May 25, 2023
- The publication and citation gender gap in Biology: bibliometric analysis of Biology faculty at top United States universities
David Alvarez‐Ponce, James Vesper·ScientometricsPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2026
- Disequilibrium in Gender Ratios among Authors who Contributed Equally
N. A. Broderick, A. Casadevall·bioRxiv·Dec 31, 2017
- Gender bias in research teams and the underrepresentation of women in science
R. Dakin, T. B. Ryder·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2019
- Examining gender imbalance in chemistry authorship
A. D. Cotton, I. B. Seiple·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2020