Does amplitude compression help or hinder attentional neural speech tracking?

Abstract

Amplitude compression is an indispensable feature of contemporary audio production and especially relevant in modern hearing aids. The cortical fate of amplitude-compressed speech signals is not well-studied, however, and may yield undesired side effects: We hypothesize that compressing the amplitude envelope of continuous speech reduces neural tracking. Yet, leveraging such a compression side effect on unwanted, distracting sounds could potentially support attentive listening if effectively reducing their neural tracking. In this study, we examined 24 young normal-hearing (NH) individuals, 19 older hearing-impaired (HI) individuals, and 12 older normal-hearing individuals. Participants were instructed to focus on one of two competing talkers while ignoring the other. Envelope compression (1:8 ratio, loudness-matched) was applied to one or both streams containing short speech repeats. Electroencephalography (EEG) allowed us to quantify the cortical response function and degree of speech tracking. With compression applied to the attended target stream, HI participants showed reduced behavioural accuracy, and compressed speech yielded generally lowered metrics of neural tracking. Importantly, we found that compressing the ignored stream resulted in a stronger neural representation of the uncompressed target speech. Our results imply that intelligent compression algorithms, with variable compression ratios applied to separated sources, could help individuals with hearing loss suppress distraction in complex multi-talker environments. Significant statementAmplitude compression, integral in contemporary audio production and hearing aids, poses an underexplored cortical challenge. Compressing the amplitude envelope of continuous speech is hypothesized to diminish neural tracking. Yet, capitalizing on this compression side effect for distracting sounds might enhance attentive listening. Studying normal-hearing (NH), older hearing-impaired (HI), and older normal hearing individuals in dual-talker scenarios, we applied envelope compression to speech streams. Both NH and HI participants showed diminished neural tracking with compression on the speech streams. Despite weaker tracking of a compressed distractor, HI individuals exhibited stronger neural representation of the concurrent target. This suggests that adaptive compression algorithms, employing variable ratios for distinct sources, could aid individuals with hearing loss in suppressing distractions in complex multi-talker environments.