Attention Decoding at the Cocktail Party: Preserved in Hearing Aid Users, Reduced in Cochlear Implant Users
Constantin JehniD, Jasmin RiegeliD, Tobias ReichenbachiD, Anja Hahne AiD, Niki VavatzanidisiD
Abstract
AbstractUsers of hearing aids (HAs) and cochlear implants (CIs) experience significant difficulty understanding a target speaker in multi-talker environments or when other background noise is present. Segregation of a particular voice from background noise occurs partly through enhanced cortical tracking of amplitude fluctuations in the target signal. Measuring a persons cortical tracking allows decoding their focus of attention and may be used for neurofeedback in hearing devices, potentially aiding their users with speech-in-noise comprehension. Most studies on cortical speech tracking have employed typical hearing (TH) individuals, whereas studies in people with hearing impairment whose cortical tracking may differ are still scarce. The objective of this study was to compare cortical speech tracking of HA (n=29) and CI users (n=24) to that of age-matched TH individuals (n=29). We recorded EEG data while the participants attended one of two competing talkers (one with a female and one with a male voice), in a free-field acoustic environment. Importantly, HA users as well as CI users used their personal, clinically-fitted devices. Cortical speech tracking was assessed through linear backward and forward models that related the EEG data to the speech envelope. For the CI users, electrical artifacts stemming from the implant were addressed through a bespoke method for artifact rejection. We found that the HA group exhibited cortical tracking and attentional modulation that were largely comparable to those of the TH group. CI users also showed successful cortical tracking. However, they displayed a profound deficit in attentional modulation, seen in the significantly poorer neural segregation of the attended vs. the ignored speech streams. These results shed light on a neurobiological mechanism for speech-in-noise comprehension and have implications for neurofeedback in hearing devices.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cortical over-representation of phonetic onsets of ignored speech in hearing impaired individuals
Sara Carta, Emina Aličković, … Giovanni M. Di Liberto·bioRxiv·Jun 26, 2023
- Hearing impairment is associated with enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope
Lien P. Decruy, Jonas Vanthornhout, Tom Francart·Hearing ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2020
- Neural correlates of individual differences in speech-in-noise performance in a large cohort of cochlear implant users
Joel Isaac Berger, Phillip E. Gander, … Inyong Choi·Ear and HearingPeer-reviewed·May 5, 2023
- Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties
Lien P. Decruy, Jonas Vanthornhout, Tom Francart·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·May 29, 2019
- Neural tracking of the speech envelope in cochlear implant users
Ben Somers, Eline Verschueren, Tom Francart·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2018
- PREDICTING SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY FROM A SELECTIVE ATTENTION DECODING PARADIGM IN COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS
W. Nogueira, H. Dolhopiatenko·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2021