Phenotype bias determines how RNA structures occupy the morphospace of all possible shapes
Abstract
Morphospaces representations of phenotypic characteristics are often populated unevenly, leaving large parts unoccupied. Such patterns are typically ascribed to contingency, or else to natural selection disfavouring certain parts of the morphospace. The extent to which developmental bias, the tendency of certain phenotypes to preferentially appear as potential variation, also explains these patterns is hotly debated. Here we demonstrate quantitatively that developmental bias is the primary explanation for the occupation of the morphospace of RNA secondary structure (SS) shapes. Upon random mutations, some RNA SS shapes (the frequent ones) are much more likely to appear than others. By using the RNAshapes method to define coarse-grained SS classes, we can directly compare the frequencies that non-coding RNA SS shapes appear in the RNAcentral database to frequencies obtained upon random sampling of sequences. We show that: a) Only the most frequent structures appear in nature; the vast majority of possible structures in the morphospace have not yet been explored. b) Remarkably small numbers of random sequences are needed to produce all the RNA SS shapes found in nature so far. c) Perhaps most surprisingly, the natural frequencies are accurately predicted, over several orders of magnitude in variation, by the likelihood that structures appear upon uniform random sampling of sequences. The ultimate cause of these patterns is not natural selection, but rather strong phenotype bias in the RNA genotype-phenotype map, a type of developmental bias or "findability constraint", which limits evolutionary dynamics to a hugely reduced subset of structures that are easy to "find".
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- RNA secondary structures are conserved but random
Samuel H. A. von der Dunk, Nora S. Martin, … Ard A. Louis·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2025
- Random and natural non-coding RNA have similar structural motif patterns but can be distinguished by bulge, loop, and bond counts
F. Ghaddar, K. Dingle·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2022
- Comparing Random and Natural RNA Boltzmann Ensembles
Hiba Khan, Paula García-Galindo, … Kamaludin Dingle·Physical BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2026
- The non-deterministic genotype-phenotype map of RNA secondary structure
P. Garcia-Galindo, S. E. Ahnert, N. S. Martin·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2023
- Bias in the arrival of variation can dominate over natural selection in Richard Dawkins' biomorphs
N. S. Martin, C. Q. Camargo, A. A. Louis·bioRxiv·May 24, 2023
- RNA-ligand complexes and the attenuation of neutral confinement in the evolution of RNA secondary structures
Antonio Loreto, Edgardo Ugalde, Carlos Espinosa‐Soto·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2026