Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Phosphoproteomics data-driven signalling network inference: does it work?
Lourdes SrirajaiD, Adriano Velasque WerhliiD, Evangelia PetsalakiiD
Abstract
The advent in high throughput global phosphoproteome profiling has led to wide phosphosite coverage and therefore the need to predict kinase substrate associations from these datasets. However, for multiple substrates, the regulatory kinase is unknown due to biased and incomplete interactome databases. In this study we compare the performance of six pairwise measures to predict kinase substrate associations using a purely data driven approach on publicly available dynamic time resolved and perturbation phosphoproteome data using mass spectrometry profiling. First, we validated the performance of these measures using as a reference both a literature-based phosphosite-specific protein interaction network and a predicted kinase substrate (KS) interactions set. The overall performance in predicting kinase-substrate associations using pairwise measures across both database-derived and predicted interactomes was poor. To expand into the wider interactome space, the performance of these measures was evaluated against a network compiled from pairs of substrates regulated by the same kinase (substrate-substrate associations). Similar to the kinase substrate predictions, a purely statistical approach to predict substrate-substrate associations was also poor. However, the addition of a sequence similarity filter for substrate-substrate associations led to a boost in performance and to the inference of statistically significant substrate-substrate associations. Our findings imply that the use of a filter to reduce the search space, such as a sequence similarity filter, can be used prior to the application of network inference methods to reduce noise and boost the signal. We also find that the current gold standard for reference sets is not adequate for evaluation as it is limited and context-agnostic. Therefore, there is a need for additional evaluation methods that have increased coverage and take into consideration the context-specific nature of kinase substrate associations.
- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Field percentile
- top 45%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking substrate-based kinase activity inference using phosphoproteomic data
Claudia I. Hernández-Armenta, David Ochoa, … Pedro Beltrão·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 13, 2017
- Accurate Prediction of Kinase-Substrate Networks Using Knowledge Graphs
Vít Nováček, Gavin McGauran, … Dirk Fey·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2020
- Evaluating signaling pathway inference from kinase-substrate interactions and phosphoproteomics data
Martín Garrido‐Rodríguez, Clément M. Potel, … Julio Sáez-Rodríguez·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2024
- CoPhosK: A Method for Comprehensive Kinase Substrate Annotation Using Co-phosphorylation Analysis
Marzieh Ayati, Danica D. Wiredja, … Mark R. Chance·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 27, 2019
- Prediction of Kinase-Substrate Associations Using The Functional Landscape of Kinases and Phosphorylation Sites
Marzieh Ayati, Serhan Yılmaz, … Mehmet Koyutürk·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2022
- Data-driven extraction of human kinase-substrate relationships from omics datasets
Benjamin Dominik Maier, Borgþór Pétursson, … Evangelia Petsalaki·Molecular & Cellular ProteomicsPeer-reviewed·May 15, 2025