Defining and detecting global transcriptional amplitude in circadian gene expression
Abstract
Many genes exhibit circadian rhythms in expression. The amplitude of oscillation, both in core clock and circadian output genes, may differ from person to person. Mutations in core clock genes are known to alter global rhythmic properties, and researchers often informally discuss "circadian amplitude." Yet, it remains unclear whether, in the general population, differences in transcriptional amplitude are largely gene-specific, or if they reflect a global, transcriptome-wide pattern -- whether some individuals have globally higher or lower amplitude across the set of all rhythmic genes. We used Cosinor regression to reanalyze four human skin time-series transcriptomic datasets (paired epidermis/dermis samples, N=11, N=19) and found that, using either absolute or relative amplitude measures, distributions of gene amplitudes tended to cluster by subject. Using a non-parametric, permutation-based statistical test, we found that in many subjects this global amplitude trend was statistically significant (p [≤] 0.01). Furthermore, we found that when rhythmic genes were divided into two sets based on peak time (genes peaking before-noon and after-noon), the subjects global amplitude in one set predicted global amplitude in the other set (p [≤] 0.05). We also found that in the paired epidermis/dermis datasets, subjects global amplitude in epidermis predicted their global amplitude in the dermis (p [≤] 0.05). After identifying these trends in the skin datasets, we then found that evidence for subject-specific transcriptional rhythm strength replicated across 6 additional human time-course datasets from adipose, muscle, and blood. Perhaps surprisingly, across datasets, we found that neither established metrics of core clock transcriptional organization nor the amplitude of core clock transcription were strongly correlated with subject-specific global amplitude.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genome-wide correlation analysis reveals Rorc as potential amplitude regulator of circadian transcriptome output
Evan S. Littleton, Madison L. Childress, … Shihoko Kojima·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2020
- Inter-layer and inter-subject variability of circadian gene expression in human skin
Marta del Olmo, Florian Spörl, … Bharath Ananthasubramaniam·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2022
- Population level rhythms in human skin: implications for circadian medicine
Gang Wu, Marc D. Ruben, … John B. Hogenesch·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2018
- Likelihood-based Tests for Detecting CircadianRhythmicity and Differential Circadian Patterns in Transcriptomic Applications
Haocheng Ding, Lingsong Meng, … Zhiguang Huo·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2021
- Genetic control and tissue specificity of transcriptomic rhythmicity
Solal Chauquet, Valentin Hivert, … Allan F. McRae·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2026
- Day-night and seasonal variation of human gene expression across tissues
Valentin Wucher, Reza Sodaei, … Roderic Guigó·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 6, 2023