Advancing cooperative breeding research with a peer-reviewed and "live" Cooperative-Breeding Database (Co-BreeD)
Yitzchak Ben MochaiD, Maike Woith, Sophie Scemama de Gialluly, Lucia Bruscagnin, Natalie KesteliD, Shai MarkmaniD, Szymon Marian DrobniakiD, Vittorio BaglioneiD, Jordan BoersmaiD, Laurence CousseauiD, Rita CovasiD, Guilherme Henrique Braga de MirandaiD, Cody J. DeyiD, Claire DoutrelantiD, Roman GulaiD, Robert HeinsohniD, Oded KeynaniD, Sjouke A. KingmaiD, Ana V. LeitãoiD, Jianqiang LiiD, Lindelani MakuyaiD, Kyle‐Mark MiddletoniD, Stephen Pruett‐JonesiD, Andrew N. RadfordiD, Carla RestrepoiD, , Michael GriesseriD
Abstract
Research on cooperative breeding (a system with the core characteristic of individuals providing care for the offspring of others) is important for understanding sociality and cooperation. However, large-scale comparative analyses on the drivers and consequences of cooperation frequently use considerably inaccurate datasets (e.g. due to inconsistent definitions and outdated information). To advance comparative research on cooperative breeding, we introduce the Cooperative-Breeding Database (Co-BreeD), a growing database of key socio-biological parameters of birds and mammals. First, we describe Co-BreeDs structure as a (i) sample-based (i.e. multiple samples per species linked to an exact sampling location and period), (ii) peer-reviewed and (iii) updatable resource. Respectively, these curating principles allow for (i) investigating intra- and inter-species variation and linking between fine-scale social and environmental parameters, (ii) accuracy and (iii) continuous correction and expansion with the publication of new data. Second, we present the first Co-BreeD dataset, which estimates the prevalence of breeding events with potential alloparents in 265 samples from 233 populations of 150 species, including 2 human societies (N = 26,366 breeding events). We conclude by demonstrating (i) how Co-BreeD facilitates more accurate comparative research (e.g. increased explanatory power by enabling the study of cooperative breeding as a continuous trait, and statistically accounting for the sampling error probabilities), and (ii) that cooperative breeding in birds and mammals is more prevalent than currently estimated.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evidence for a reproductive sharing continuum in cooperatively breeding mammals and birds: consequences for comparative research
Y. Ben Mocha, T. Dahan, … S. Markman·bioRxiv·May 5, 2023
- Data on the frequency of non-reproductive adults in a cross-cultural sample of small-scale human societies
Cody Ross, Paul Hooper, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2015
- Allonursing (Co-BreeD): Its prevalence, functions and hypotheses across mammals and human cultures
Yitzchak Ben Mocha, Maike Woith, … Michael Michael Griesser·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2026
- Cooperative breeding and the emergence of multilevel societies in birds
E. Camerlenghi, A. McQueen, … A. Peters·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2021
- Context-Dependent Fitness Outcomes of Helping in the Cooperatively-Breeding Florida Scrub-Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens)
Jeremy Summers, Bailey S.C.L. Jones, … Nancy X Chen·bioRxiv·Jul 21, 2025
- Opening a standardized, spatially contiguous biodiversity database collected over 40 years: Czech breeding bird atlases 1973-77, 1985-89, 2001-03, and 2014-17
Gabriel Ortega‐Solís, Karel Šťastný, … Petr Keil·bioRxiv·May 29, 2026