A comparison of BirdNET, expert listening and acoustic indices to monitor avian diversity in a Mediterranean agricultural landscape

Passive acoustic monitoring poses an immense potential to assess avian diversity in many habitats, including agricultural landscapes. At the same time, automated recorders generate large datasets which present a challenge for processing and effectively assessing biodiversity. Methods such as manual listening by experts, automated detection algorithms like BirdNET and calculating acoustic indices all present different trade-offs in assessment of biodiversity through passive acoustic monitoring. In the present study we recorded soundscapes in a low-intensity agricultural landscape in western Turkiye in all four seasons. Two expert ornithologists listened to a subset of these recordings identifying bird species from the recordings. We also ran the same sample of recordings on BirdNET to compare BirdNET detections with expert detections and calculated acoustic indices for each recording. The results showed that BirdNET detected more species than experts, although some may not be reliable detections. Two acoustic indices (bioacoustic index and acoustic complexity index) were correlated positively with number of species detected by experts and one (normalized difference soundscape index) with number of species detected by BirdNET but the correlations were modest. The results show that acoustic indices may have limited value in detecting biodiversity and automated detection algorithms may do a better job, although these may need to be trained with local data to improve detection and classification.