TMS orientation and pulse waveform manipulation activates different neural populations: direct evidence from TMS-EEG
Alberto PisoniiD, Alessandra VergallitoiD, Giulia C. MattavelliiD, Erica VaroliiD, Matteo FecchioiD, Mario RosanovaiD, Adenauer Girardi CasaliiD, Leonor J. Romero LauroiD
Abstract
Monophasic and biphasic TMS pulses and coil orientations produce different responses in terms of motor output and sensory perception. Those differences have been attributed to the activation of specific neural populations. However, up to date, direct evidence supporting this hypothesis is still missing since studies were mostly based on indirect measures of cortical activation, i.e., motor evoked potentials or phosphenes. Here, we investigated for the first time the impact of different coil orientations and waveforms on a non-primary cortical area, namely the premotor cortex, by measuring TMS evoked EEG potentials (TEPs). We aimed at determining whether TEPs produced by differently oriented biphasic and monophasic TMS pulses diverge and whether these differences are underpinned by the activation of specific neural populations. To do so, we applied TMS over the right premotor cortex with monophasic or biphasic waveforms oriented perpendicularly (in the anterior-posterior direction and vice-versa) or parallel (latero-medial or medio-laterally) to the target gyrus. EEG was concurrently recorded from 60 electrodes. We analyzed TEPs at the level of EEG sensors and cortical sources both in time and time-frequency domain. Biphasic pulses evoked larger early TEP components, which reflect cortical excitability properties of the underlying cortex, in both parallel directions when compared to the perpendicular conditions. Conversely, monophasic pulses, when oriented perpendicularly to the stimulated gyrus, elicited a greater N100, which is a reliable TEP component linked to GABAb-mediated inhibitory processes, than when parallel to the gyrus. Our results provide direct evidence supporting the hypothesis that TMS pulse waveform and TMS coil orientations affect which neural population is engaged.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Direction-Specific Effects of Biphasic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cortical and Cortico-spinal Excitability
Mirja Osnabruegge, Carolina Kanig, … Stefan Schoisswohl·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2026
- TMS-evoked EEG potentials from prefrontal and parietal cortex: reliability, site specificity, and effects of NMDA receptor blockade
Nigel C. Rogasch, Carl Moritz Zipser, … Ulf Ziemann·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2019
- The spatiotemporal evolution of TMS-evoked potentials reflects direct cortical activation
Matteo Fecchio, Simone Russo, … Mario Rosanova·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2025
- Pinging the Brain with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Cortical Reactivity in Time and Space
Sangtae Ahn, Flavio Frӧhlich·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2021
- The dependency of TMS-evoked potentials on electric-field orientation in the cortex
Ida Granö, Tuomas P. Mutanen, … Pantelis Lioumis·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2025
- Characterising the contribution of auditory and somatosensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials following stimulation of prefrontal, premotor and parietal cortex
Mana Biabani, Alex Fornito, … Nigel C. Rogasch·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024