Dissecting errors made in response to externally- and internally- driven visual tasks in the common marmosets and humans
Wajd AmlyiD, Chih-Yang CheniD, Hirotaka OnoeiD, Tadashi IsaiD
Abstract
Various visual paradigms in oculomotor research have been used for studying the neural processes of eye movement, cognitive control, attention and neurological disorders. However, we usually analyse data collected from humans or over-trained non-human primates (NHPs), focusing only on successful trials, whereas error trials are usually excluded. These errors may repetitively show up in diseases, but their interpretation would be difficult due to the absence of records taken from healthy controls. In the current study, we aimed to analyse both correctly and incorrectly performed trials in both marmosets and humans. We trained marmosets to perform the gap saccade task and the oculomotor delayed response task. We also collected data from human subjects who performed identical tasks. We categorised error trials into three different groups, based on the time when an incorrect response occurred. We also interpreted possible causes by analysing saccade reaction time, saccade landing position and task history. Despite the rareness of human error, we found that marmosets and humans showed remarkably similar behaviour in error and success. We also found that successful saccades in the gap saccade task had always the highest peak velocity in both species, reflecting faster sensorimotor processing for correct responses. Our results suggest that marmosets and humans might share similar neural processing for successful and unsuccessful oculomotor behaviour, making them a suitable model for studying human behaviour. More importantly, analysing error trials in sync with successful ones will provide further insights into the cognitive and sensorimotor processes. NEW AND NOTEWORTHYThis is the first detailed report focusing on analysing both error and successful trials in oculomotor tasks. We proposed nomenclatures and a generalizable way of grouping and analysing error trials. Our results also indicate that marmosets can be a promising experimental candidate for oculomotor research because they replicate the saccade properties of error and success seen in humans. This will help set the baseline measurements to study brain disorders using NHP and understand the neural mechanisms from a different perspective.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Common properties of visually-guided saccadic behavior and bottom-up attention in marmoset, macaque, and human
C.-Y. Chen, D. Matrov, … T. Isa·bioRxiv·May 27, 2020
- Ocular following responses of the marmoset monkey are dependent on post-saccadic delay, spatiotemporal frequency and saccade direction
Hoi Ming Ken Yip, Timothy John Allison-Walker, … Nicholas S. C. Price·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2023
- Methods for chair restraint and training of the common marmoset on oculomotor tasks
Kevin Johnston, Kevin C. Barker, … Stefan Everling·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 24, 2018
- Motion perception in the common marmoset
Shaun Liam Cloherty, Jacob L. Yates, … Jude F. Mitchell·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Oct 15, 2019
- Ocular following eye movements in marmosets follow complex motion trajectories
Jagruti J. Pattadkal, Carrie Barr, Nicholas J. Priebe·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2023
- Single unit activity in marmoset posterior parietal cortex in a gap saccade task
Liya Ma, Janahan Selvanayagam, … Stefan Everling·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 22, 2020