Network NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Braiding Braak and Braak: Staging patterns and model selection in network neurodegeneration
Prama Setia PutraiD, Travis ThompsoniD, Pavanjit ChaggariD, Alain GorielyiD, for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
Abstract
A hallmark of Alzheimers disease is the aggregation of insoluble amyloid-beta plaques and tau protein neurofibrillary tangles. A key histopathological observation is that tau protein aggregates follow a structured progression pattern through the brain. Mathematical network models of prion-like propagation have the ability to capture such patterns but a number of factors impact the observed staging result, thus introducing questions regarding model selection. Here, we introduce a novel approach, based on braid diagrams, for studying the structured progression of a marker evolving on a network. We apply this approach to a six-stage Braak patternof tau proteins, in Alzheimers disease, motivated by a recent observation that seed-competent tau precedes tau aggregation. We show that the different modeling choices, from the model parameters to the connectome resolution, play a significant role in the landscape of observable staging patterns. Our approach provides a systematic way to approach model selection for network propagation of neurodegenerative diseases that ensures both reproducibility and optimal parameter fitting. Author summaryNetwork diffusion models of neurodegenerative diseases are a class of dynamical systems that simulate the evolution of toxic proteins on the connectome. These models predict, from an initial seed, a pattern of invasion called staging. The generalized staging problem seeks to systematically study the effect of various model choices on staging. We introduce methods based on braid diagrams to test the possible staging landscape of a model and how it depends on the choice of connectome, as well as the model parameters. Our primary finding is that connectome construction, the choice of the graph Laplacian, and transport models all have an impact on staging that should be taken into account in any study.
- Citations
- 21
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Two for tau: Automated model discovery reveals two-stage tau aggregation dynamics in Alzheimer's disease
Charles A. Stockman, Alain Goriely, … and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Brain MultiphysicsPeer-reviewed·Nov 12, 2024
- A network based study of the dynamics of Aβ and {tau} proteins in Alzheimer's disease
S. Bianchi, Germana Landi, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2024
- Prion-like spreading of Alzheimer's disease within the brain's connectome
Sveva Fornari, Amelie Schäfer, … Ellen Kuhl A·Journal of The Royal Society InterfacePeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2019
- Spatially-extended nucleation-aggregation-fragmentation models for the dynamics of prion-like neurodegenerative protein-spreading in the brain and its connectome
Sveva Fornari, Amelie Schäfer, … Alain Goriely·Journal of Theoretical BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2019
- Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer’s disease
Jacob W. Vogel, Yasser Iturria‐Medina, … Mark A. Mintun·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2020
- Understanding the complex interplay between tau, amyloid and the network in the spatiotemporal progression of Alzheimer's Disease
Ashish Raj, Justin Torok, Kamalini G. Ranasinghe·Progress in NeurobiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2025