PsychophysiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Preprocessing Choices for P3 Analyses with Mobile EEG: A Systematic Literature Review and Interactive Exploration
Nadine Svenja Josée JacobseniD, Daniel KristantoiD, Suong Welp, Yusuf Coşku Inceler, Stefan DebeneriD
Abstract
Preprocessing is necessary to extract meaningful results from electroencephalography (EEG) data. With many possible preprocessing choices, their impact on outcomes is fundamental. While previous studies have explored the effects of preprocessing on stationary EEG data, this research delves into mobile EEG, where complex processing is necessary to address motion artifacts. Specifically, we describe the preprocessing choices studies reported for analyzing the P3 event-related potential (ERP) during walking and standing. A systematic review of 258 studies of the P3 during walking, identified 27 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Two independent coders extracted preprocessing choices reported in each study. Analysis of preprocessing choices revealed commonalities and differences, such as the widespread use of offline filters but limited application of line noise correction (3 of 27 studies). Notably, 59% of studies involved manual processing steps, and 56% omitted reporting critical parameters for at least one step. All studies employed unique preprocessing strategies. These findings align with stationary EEG preprocessing results, emphasizing the necessity for standardized reporting in mobile EEG research. We implemented an interactive visualization tool (Shiny app) to aid the exploration of the preprocessing landscape. The app allows users to structure the literature regarding different processing steps, enter planned processing methods, and compare them with the literature. The app could be utilized to examine how these choices impact P3 results and understand the robustness of various processing options. We hope to increase awareness regarding the potential influence of preprocessing decisions and advocate for comprehensive reporting standards to foster reproducibility in mobile EEG research.
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
- Citations
- 13
- FWCI
- 0.84
- Field percentile
- top 35%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- How Sensitive are EEG Results to Preprocessing Methods: A Benchmarking Study
Kay A. Robbins, Jonathan Touryan, … Nima Bigdely-Shamlo·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Mar 26, 2020
- An adversarial approach to guide the selection of preprocessing pipelines for ERP studies
Daniele Scanzi, Dylan A. Taylor, … Paul Michael Corballis·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2026
- Mobile EEG for Neurourbanism Research - What Could Possibly Go Wrong?A Critical Review with Guidelines
Klaus Gramann·Journal of Environmental PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2024
- Capturing the developing brain in motion: A practical tutorial for recording mobile EEG in naturally moving children
Annika Werwach, Sarah D. Power, … Sarah Jessen·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2026
- Is EEG best left alone?
Alain De Cheveigné A·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2023
- PyLossless: A non-destructive EEG processing pipeline
Scott Huberty, James A. Desjardins, … Christian O’Reilly·Behavior Research MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2026