Bayesian inference of population prevalence
Robin A. A. InceiD, Angus PatoniD, Jim KayiD, Philippe G. SchynsiD
Abstract
Within neuroscience, psychology and neuroimaging, the most frequently used statistical approach is null-hypothesis significance testing (NHST) of the population mean. An alternative approach is to perform NHST within individual participants and then infer, from the proportion of participants showing an effect, the prevalence of that effect in the population. We propose a novel Bayesian method to estimate such population prevalence that offers several advantages over population mean NHST. This method provides a population-level inference that is currently missing from study designs with small participant numbers, such as in traditional psychophysics and in precision imaging. Bayesian prevalence delivers a quantitative population estimate with associated uncertainty instead of reducing an experiment to a binary inference. Bayesian prevalence is widely applicable to a broad range of studies in neuroscience, psychology, and neuroimaging. Its emphasis on detecting effects within individual participants can also help address replicability issues in these fields.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 78
- FWCI
- 9.48
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Practical Bayesian Inference in Neuroscience: Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace the Distribution
Brandon S. Coventry, Edward L. Bartlett·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Jun 25, 2024
- Bayesian p-curve Mixture Models as a Tool to Dissociate Effect Size and Effect Prevalence
John P. Veillette, Howard C. Nusbaum·Communications PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 22, 2025
- Evidence for the null hypothesis in functional magnetic resonance imaging using group-level Bayesian inference
Ruslan S. Masharipov, Irina Knyazeva, … Maxim V. Kireev·Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2021
- When null hypothesis significance testing is unsuitable for research: a reassessment
Dénes Szűcs, John P. A. Ioannidis·Frontiers in Human NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 2, 2017
- Hypothesis-testing Improves the Predicted Reliability of Neuroscience Research
Bradley E. Alger·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2019
- Is the Statistic Value All We Should Care about in Neuroimaging?
Gang Chen, Paul A Taylor, Robert W Cox·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2017